>Wired seemed to have a slightly different take, but I stopped reading the >Forbes article before I got to Gilmore's comment. > >http://www.wired.com/news/news/politics/story/21790.html I think that's the article forwarded to this list that I just read earlier. A Gilmore comment was in that article as well. Wired didn't strike me as having a different take so much as a vastly more detailed, in-depth article, including plenty of historical information, allegations of conspiracies of various sorts, and so on. Personally, it's kinda weird -- I'm happy to have qmail up and running, even though it probably never deals with more than 300 emails in a day. I'm delighted with the more positive, freedom- oriented aspects of this crypto development, even though I don't really ever use crypto myself. And I support the Second Amendment, even though I don't like guns. I guess I just really appreciate the efforts of others to preserve my freedoms, even ones I have little or no intention of ever exercising. Again, thanks, Dan! tq vm, (burley)
