Derek Harkness <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Is there any real advantage to upgrading to daemontools >= 0.60? I'm >using 0.53 now which is working great. 0.61 is "better" than 0.53, but, as you say, 0.53 works great. If you have 0.53 installed, configured, and running, I wouldn't recommend switching to 0.61 unless you just have nothing better to do with your time. For a new installation, if you don't need LWQ-like handholding, 0.61 is probably the way to go. The svscan mechanism is nice. One downside to 0.61 is that its tai65n timestamps are incompatible with qmailanalog. -Dave
- Grave Difficulties (lspawn, Maildir, etc) jarrid jeeby
- Re: Grave Difficulties (lspawn, Maildir, etc) Dave Sill
- Re: Grave Difficulties (lspawn, Maildir, etc) jarrid jeeby
- Re: Grave Difficulties (lspawn, Maildir, etc) jarrid jeeby
- Re: Grave Difficulties (lspawn, Maildir, etc) Dave Sill
- Daemontools? Derek Harkness
- Re: Daemontools? Dave Sill
- Re: Daemontools? Jos Backus
- Re: Grave Difficulties (lspawn, Maildir, etc) jarrid jeeby
- Re: Grave Difficulties (lspawn, Maildir, etc) jarrid jeeby
- Re: Grave Difficulties (lspawn, Maildir, etc) Timothy L. Mayo
- Re: Grave Difficulties (lspawn, Maildir, etc) jarrid jeeby
- Re: Grave Difficulties (lspawn, Maildir, etc) Timothy L. Mayo
- Re: Grave Difficulties (lspawn, Maildir, etc) jarrid jeeby
