Re: How good is RBL at filtering spam?

[Alex Rubenstein]

Fyi, from mail.nac.net:

tempest:/var/log/mail$ zcat maillog.0.gz |grep smtpd | grep " ok " | wc -l
  111001

tempest:/var/log/mail$ zcat maillog.0.gz | grep smtpd | grep "BOUNCEMAIL" | wc -l
     100


You must be aimed at for spam more often then we are.








On Fri, 1 Oct 1999, Peter Green wrote:

> On Fri, 1 Oct 1999, Markus Stumpf wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, Sep 20, 1999 at 04:24:06PM -0400, David Harris wrote:
> > > > I'll run this for a few days and let the list know what I find.
> > 
> > While we're on some statistics:
> 
> I'll throw mine in, especially since I'm really happy with RBL:
> 
>   day       tcpcontrol ok   RBL rejects
> 1999/09/25     13726            871
> 1999/09/26     14506           1099
> 1999/09/27     31952           1112
> 1999/09/28     28585           1524
> 1999/09/29     42701            947
> 1999/09/30     60224           1103
> 
> /pg
> -- 
> Peter Green
> Gospel Communications Network, SysAdmin
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
>