I think you are missing the point.  I'm not looking at the
exit code.  Let me be specific.  I was using a Java transport class
that was not properly written.  I would send a message with this class
and the class would say the message was sent.  However, in reality,
smtpd would reject the message.

        To debug the problem I used recordio.  I noticed that the
class was not reading any output from smptd.  It just stuffed the
whole message into smptd and exited.  So, I modified the class to
read input and check for +OK and -ERROR.  

        I recorded an entire session where every response from smptd
was +OK, BUT the mail was never delivered.  By pouring through the 
logs, I noticed that when there was an exit code of 256, the mail
was not delivered.  When the exit code was 0, the mail was delivered.
Somewhere during this whole process, I saw the message about bad
cr/lf.  Once I fixed that problem, everything started to work.

        So, the point here is that smtpd responded with +OK for everything,
leading me to believe the mail had been accepted and was delivered.  
However, the mail *never* showed up in the queue.  The qmail log was
blank and the smtpd log showed an exit code of 256.


> This stuff is pretty much irrelevant. You can't expect to check the status
> of which messages were accepted successfully by looking at the exit code.
> SMTP allows for the transfer of more than one message and for messages
> to be resent after some failure in the same session. So a single exit code
> can't tell you all of what you need to know. The data command will return a
> success code if the message was successfully accepted. This is what needs to
> be checked.

-- 
+-------------------------------------------------------------------+
+  Thomas M. Sasala, Electrical Engineer       [EMAIL PROTECTED]       +
+  MRJ Technology Solutions                    http://www.mrj.com   +
+  10461 White Granite Drive, Suite 102        (W)(703)277-1714     +
+  Oakton, VA   22124                          (F)(703)277-1702     +
+-------------------------------------------------------------------+

Reply via email to