I don't use qmail-analog, but the important numbers are here - this is a single
machine that ran at full load for half the day, then sat idle for the other half...
I'm making some changes in the coming week that I'm sure will push me well over
600,000 per machine per day, and I have new development starting soon that I estimate
(from some prototype testing) that will get me near 1mm per day per machine. qmail is
undeniably the fastest. Success with qmail is all about how you tailor your pieces of
the system to enable qmail to do its thing.
Message statistics:
New messages: 254932
Info messages: 254932
Total bytes: 5522068755
Avg message size: 21660.9478409929
Bounce messages: 5607
Triple bounce (discarded): 5
End messages: 300058
Delivery Statistics:
Started deliveries:
Local: 40407
Remote: 279142
Successful deliveries: 294579
Failed deliveries (will bounce): 5588
Deferred deliveries (will retry): 18302
Mangled reporting (will retry): 0
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Roger Merchberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, October 08, 1999 10:24 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Qmail sets speed record!
>
>
> Rumor has it that Fred Lindberg may have mentioned these words:
>
> >From qmail analog (always reliable in the past):
> >
> >Total delivery attempts: 362206
> > success: 269231
> > failure: 6035
> > deferral: 86940
> >Total ddelay (s): -229659590.223920
> >Average ddelay per success (s): -853.020604
> >Total xdelay (s): -930514817.432029
> >Average xdelay per delivery attempt (s): -2569.020992
> >Time span (days): -10863.5
> [snip]
>
> >This makes qmail the undisputed leader in mail delivery speed!
> [snip]
>
> You must have been using that new qmail-psi package - you know, the one
> that sends out your mail even before you thought about writing it...
> ;-)
>
> Maybe Russ should modify the qmail.org homepage to list that package a
> little more prominantly -- it seems to work wonderfully!!! ;^>
>
> Just a little Friday fun,
> Roger "Merch" Merchberger
> --
> Roger "Merch" Merchberger --- sysadmin, Iceberg Computers
> Recycling is good, right??? Ok, so I'll recycle an old .sig.
>
> If at first you don't succeed, nuclear warhead
> disarmament should *not* be your first career choice.
>
