qmail Digest 14 Oct 1999 10:00:01 -0000 Issue 789
Topics (messages 31572 through 31592):
Re: flushing sendmail queue after installing qmail?
31572 by: Anand Buddhdev
31576 by: Russell Nelson
Re: David Sill's startup script
31573 by: Dave Sill
Re: MAIL FROM: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
31574 by: Russell Nelson
Re: Security considerations of chown qmaill
31575 by: Dave Sill
Re: getting qmail to retry
31577 by: David Dyer-Bennet
31578 by: Phil Howard
maildir2mbox
31579 by: Joel Foote
31581 by: Tomasz Papszun
31582 by: Joel Foote
warning: trouble opening...
31580 by: Kevin Sawyer
Inbound Routing Problem
31583 by: Stirling Olson
Any quick way to find the current concurrent deliveries
31584 by: Dongping Deng
31586 by: Markus Stumpf
31588 by: Magnus Bodin
Slow Authentication (need help)
31585 by: Jose de Leon
31587 by: Markus Stumpf
control/{locals,rcpthosts,virtualdomains}
31589 by: Franck PORCHER
31590 by: Anand Buddhdev
RPM memphis problem??
31591 by: Jon Lur�s
Problem while sending email to some website
31592 by: Hong Li
Administrivia:
To subscribe to the digest, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe from the digest, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To bug my human owner, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To post to the list, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
----------------------------------------------------------------------
On Wed, Oct 13, 1999 at 11:00:11AM +0100, A Curtin wrote:
> Having recently installed qmail, I've still got some deferred messages
> in the sendmail queue.
>
> Is it OK to run '/usr/lib/sendmail.real -q' to try to send these
> messages? It won't affect qmail, will it?
That's fine. A sendmail queue run won't affect qmail.
--
See complete headers for more info
A Curtin writes:
> Having recently installed qmail, I've still got some deferred messages
> in the sendmail queue.
>
> Is it OK to run '/usr/lib/sendmail.real -q' to try to send these
> messages? It won't affect qmail, will it?
Yes. No. I mean, Yes and No. Yes to the first, and no to the second.
--
-russ nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://russnelson.com
Crynwr sells support for free software | PGPok | Government schools are so
521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315 268 1925 voice | bad that any rank amateur
Potsdam, NY 13676-3213 | +1 315 268 9201 FAX | can outdo them. Homeschool!
"Subba Rao" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>root@caesar:/etc/rc.d# ./rc.qmail start
>Starting qmail: qmail-send qmail-smtpdsupervise: usage: supervise dir
You're using the wrong version of daemontools. LWQ clearly states that
it only works with 0.53.
>One other question, how do I make my email clients to read from the Maildir?
>I use ELM and MUTT. I would like to be able to read these messages. I do see
>them in the Maildir/new directory.
For elm, use elq, which comes with qmail. Mutt knows maildirs, so
just point it at a the appropriate directory.
-Dave
Einar Bordewich writes:
> Has anyone made som MX/A/PTR checking on MAIL FROM: in qmail-smtpd?
Yes, there's a patch for it on www.qmail.org.
--
-russ nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://russnelson.com
Crynwr sells support for free software | PGPok | Government schools are so
521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315 268 1925 voice | bad that any rank amateur
Potsdam, NY 13676-3213 | +1 315 268 9201 FAX | can outdo them. Homeschool!
"Todd A. Jacobs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>In the web site at
>http://web.infoave.net/~dsill/lwq.html#install-daemontools,
>there's a point where one is directed to create a directory and chown
>qmaill. Part of the init.d script seems to rely on this step.
>
>My question is whether there is a security consideration, because qmaill
>is part of the nofiles group. Isn't security being compromised by allowing
>qmaill to own files?
Yes, there's "risk" associated with having log files belong to group
"nofiles": if someone breaks into qmaill or nofiles they can tamper
with your logs. Big deal. If that keeps you up at night, even if it's
fixed, you'll have many sleepless nights. It should be easy to create
another uid/gid to own the logs. I didn't do that in LWQ because I
didn't think it was worth the added complexity. Maybe I was wrong.
-Dave
Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes on 13 October 1999 at 00:50:49 -0400
> Here it is. I just went back and looked it up to be sure. Section 2.4.1:
>
> ===
> ... In general, a relay SMTP SHOULD assume that the
> message content it has received is valid and, assuming that the envelope
> permits doing so, relay it without inspecting that content.
>
> ===
>
> Well, this is stated right in the middle of a lengthy discussion on 8bit
> message contents/transparency issues, so they might be referring to that
> issue alone. Still, something like that just jumps up and grabs your
> attention.
What leaps out at me is that it's about *relaying*, not about
accepting mail for local delivery.
--
David Dyer-Bennet **Update your records, forwarding expires soon** [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://dd-b.lighthunters.net/ (photos) Minicon: http://www.mnstf.org/minicon
http://www.dd-b.net/dd-b (sf) http://ouroboros.demesne.com/ Ouroboros Bookworms
Join the 20th century before it's too late!
David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
> Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes on 13 October 1999 at 00:50:49 -0400
>
> > Here it is. I just went back and looked it up to be sure. Section 2.4.1:
> >
> > ===
> > ... In general, a relay SMTP SHOULD assume that the
> > message content it has received is valid and, assuming that the envelope
> > permits doing so, relay it without inspecting that content.
> >
> > ===
> >
> > Well, this is stated right in the middle of a lengthy discussion on 8bit
> > message contents/transparency issues, so they might be referring to that
> > issue alone. Still, something like that just jumps up and grabs your
> > attention.
>
> What leaps out at me is that it's about *relaying*, not about
> accepting mail for local delivery.
> --
> David Dyer-Bennet **Update your records, forwarding expires soon** [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://dd-b.lighthunters.net/ (photos) Minicon: http://www.mnstf.org/minicon
> http://www.dd-b.net/dd-b (sf) http://ouroboros.demesne.com/ Ouroboros Bookworms
> Join the 20th century before it's too late!
Good point!
--
Phil Howard | [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
phil | [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
at | [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ipal | [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
dot | [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
net | [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Whenever I run maildir2mbox, either directly or using elq etc.. I get:
fatal: MAILTMP not set..
Where do I set this? I have been unable to find any info about it, I even
tried setting a global variable, it didnt help..
Thanks,
Joel
On Wed, 13 Oct 1999 at 7:06:40 -0700, Joel Foote wrote:
> Whenever I run maildir2mbox, either directly or using elq etc.. I get:
> fatal: MAILTMP not set..
>
> Where do I set this? I have been unable to find any info about it, I even
> tried setting a global variable, it didnt help..
>
man maildir2mbox
[...]
You must supply three environment variables to
maildir2mbox: MAILDIR is the name of your maildir direc-
tory; MAIL is the name of your mbox file; and MAILTMP is a
temporary file that maildir2mbox can overwrite. MAILTMP
and MAIL must be on the same filesystem.
It depends on your shell. E.g. for Bourne-like one:
export MAILTMP=some_temporary_file
I think that a file named ~/mailtmp would be OK.
If it works, you can add it to one of your session-startup files
(maybe into ~./bash_profile or - if for all users - /etc/profile).
--
Tomasz Papszun SysAdm @ TP S.A. Lodz, Poland | And it's only
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lodz.tpsa.pl/ | ones and zeros.
Ok, thanks..
After putting those in /etc/profile its working fine..
I didnt install the appropriate man pages, so when I had done a man on that
it didnt come up, fixed that and got the page..
Thanks again =)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tomasz Papszun [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 1999 1:22 PM
> To: Joel Foote
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: maildir2mbox
>
> On Wed, 13 Oct 1999 at 7:06:40 -0700, Joel Foote wrote:
> > Whenever I run maildir2mbox, either directly or using elq etc.. I get:
> > fatal: MAILTMP not set..
> >
> > Where do I set this? I have been unable to find any info about it, I
> even
> > tried setting a global variable, it didnt help..
> >
>
> man maildir2mbox
> [...]
> You must supply three environment variables to
> maildir2mbox: MAILDIR is the name of your maildir direc-
> tory; MAIL is the name of your mbox file; and MAILTMP is a
> temporary file that maildir2mbox can overwrite. MAILTMP
> and MAIL must be on the same filesystem.
>
>
> It depends on your shell. E.g. for Bourne-like one:
> export MAILTMP=some_temporary_file
>
> I think that a file named ~/mailtmp would be OK.
> If it works, you can add it to one of your session-startup files
> (maybe into ~./bash_profile or - if for all users - /etc/profile).
>
> --
> Tomasz Papszun SysAdm @ TP S.A. Lodz, Poland | And it's only
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lodz.tpsa.pl/ | ones and zeros.
warning: trouble opening local/xx/xxxxx; will try again later
warning: trouble opening remote/xx/xxxxx; will try again later
I am seeing a lot of these errors daily. When I stop and restart qmail (not
just -ALRM or -HUP qmail-send, but '/etc/rc.d/init.d/qmail restart') most of
the messages in question get delivered immediately (except in cases where
the remote is unavailable).
I am nowhere near my concurrency limits. What could the problem be? What
causes this error?
--Kevin
---
Kevin Sawyer - President/CEO - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Applied Personal Computing, Inc. - APCiNet - http://www.apci.net
6001 Old Collinsville Road, Building #3, Fairview Heights, IL 62208
Office: (618) 632-7282 FAX: (618) 632-7287 Support: (618) 628-2Net
I've searched all the www.qmail.org info that I can find and I'm still
unable to resolve a problem that I'm having. I replaced sendmail on my RH
Linux 6.0 box (kernel 2.2.12) with qmail 1.03. I'm able to send messages to
anywhere and but only receive messages from my local LAN. I have restarted
qmail several times and verified that my /var/qmail/control/locals and
/var/qmail/control/rcpthosts both have the appropriate values. I'm using
daemontools-0.53 and ucspi-tcp-0.84. Here is some more info:
Computer Name
k2.foraker.com
Internal IP Address
192.168.100.160
/var/qmail/control/locals
foraker.com
/var/qmail/control/rcpthosts
foraker.com
/etc/tcp.smtp ("compiled" to /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb)
127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
192.168.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
:allow
DNS entries on primary DNS server for foraker.com
@ 6H IN SOA ns.digex.net. hostmaster.digex.net.
(
1999021201 ; serial
3H ; refresh
1H ; retry
2D ; expiry
6H ) ; minimum
6H IN NS ns.digex.net.
6H IN NS ns2.digex.net.
6H IN A 207.86.100.39
6H IN MX 5 mail
x 6H IN CNAME @
mail 6H IN A 207.86.100.36
www 6H IN CNAME @
@ 6H IN SOA ns.digex.net. hostmaster.digex.net.
(
1999021201 ; serial
3H ; refresh
1H ; retry
2D ; expiry
6H ) ; minimum
Also, the mail server is on the inside of a firewall. That said, sendmail
was working fine before so I don't think it is a firewall issue.
Why can't I receive email from outside my LAN? BTW, folks are getting the
following in a "bounced" email:
**********************************************
** THIS IS A WARNING MESSAGE ONLY **
** YOU DO NOT NEED TO RESEND YOUR MESSAGE **
**********************************************
The original message was received at Tue, 12 Oct 1999 21:07:39 -0400 (EDT)
from 216-164-254-171.s425.tnt6.nyw.ny.dialup.rcn.com [216.164.254.171]
----- The following addresses had transient non-fatal errors -----
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
----- Transcript of session follows -----
... while talking to mail.foraker.com.:
<<< 421 loki.iport.com Sorry, you are not authorized to make this
connection.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... Deferred: Connection reset by mail.foraker.com.
Warning: message still undelivered after 4 hours
Will keep trying until message is 5 days old
Reporting-MTA: dns; hi-d.servercast.net
Arrival-Date: Tue, 12 Oct 1999 21:07:39 -0400 (EDT)
Final-Recipient: RFC822; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Action: delayed
Status: 4.5.0
Remote-MTA: DNS; mail.foraker.com
Diagnostic-Code: SMTP;
Last-Attempt-Date: Wed, 13 Oct 1999 01:20:24 -0400 (EDT)
Will-Retry-Until: Sun, 17 Oct 1999 21:07:39 -0400 (EDT)
Thank you very much!
Stirling Olson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is the number of "qmail-remote" a rough measure of the current concurrent
deliveries?
Thanks
On Wed, Oct 13, 1999 at 03:43:37PM -0700, Dongping Deng wrote:
> Is the number of "qmail-remote" a rough measure of the current concurrent
> deliveries?
Yes.
But it may be easier to have a look at your logfile. Watch out for lines
like
status: local 1/120 remote 3/120
That tells the number of current deliveries and the max values. In this
example there is currently 1 local of 120 max and 3 remote of 120 max
\Maex
--
SpaceNet GmbH | http://www.Space.Net/ | Yeah, yo mama dresses
Research & Development | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | you funny and you need
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 | Tel: +49 (89) 32356-0 | a mouse to delete files
D-80807 Muenchen | Fax: +49 (89) 32356-299 |
On Thu, Oct 14, 1999 at 04:17:33AM +0200, Markus Stumpf wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 13, 1999 at 03:43:37PM -0700, Dongping Deng wrote:
> > Is the number of "qmail-remote" a rough measure of the current concurrent
> > deliveries?
>
> Yes.
> But it may be easier to have a look at your logfile. Watch out for lines
> like
> status: local 1/120 remote 3/120
> That tells the number of current deliveries and the max values. In this
> example there is currently 1 local of 120 max and 3 remote of 120 max
And if you are using daemontools-logging, you might want to watch your
concurrency levels with mrtg as well.
Here's a script that looks up the latest status line and reports local and
remote concurrency to mrtg:
----------------------
#!/usr/bin/perl
# qmail-mrtg-concurrency
# mrtg-script for logging qmail concurrency levels
# 1999-10-09, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://x42.com/
# Share and enjoy
use strict;
my ($qmail_log_dir) = (@ARGV);
chop($qmail_log_dir) if $qmail_log_dir =~ m#/$#;
my ($lastfile);
opendir(DIR, $qmail_log_dir) or die;
@_ = sort readdir(DIR);
for (;;)
{
$_ = pop(@_);
die "No log files at all." unless $_;
next unless s/^\@//;
$lastfile = "$qmail_log_dir/\@$_";
last;
}
closedir(DIR);
my $status = rep " status: " $lastfile | tail -1;
if ($status =~ m#local (\d+)/\d+ remote (\d+)#)
{
print "$1\n$2\n";
}
else
{
print "0\n\0\n";
}
----------------------
In mrtg.cfg:
#-------------------------------------------------------------------
Title[concurrency]: example.com - qmail concurrency
MaxBytes[concurrency]: 1000
AbsMax[concurrency]: 10000
Options[concurrency]: gauge
Target[concurrency]: /usr/local/bin/qmail-mrtg-concurrency
/var/log/qmail/send
PageTop[concurrency]: <H1>example.com - qmail
concurrency</H1>
ShortLegend[concurrency]: Concurrency
YLegend[concurrency]: Concurrency
Legend1[concurrency]: Concurrency
LegendI[concurrency]: Local:
LegendO[concurrency]: Remote:
WithPeak[concurrency]: ymwd
#-------------------------------------------------------------------
--
magnus
-- MOST useless 1998 * http://x42.com/
I'm using QMail 1.03, and using tcpserver instead of inetd. Linux 2.0.xx.
Some POP3 account users are complaining of slow POP3 authentication. About
50% of the time, authentication times out. I have noticed the problem too,
but once authenticated, download of email is quite fast.
Are there not enough connections allocated for tcpserver? How can I check
if maximum connections are being used?
Or are there settings in QMail itself I need to change?
Thanks,
Jose
On Wed, Oct 13, 1999 at 04:33:27PM -0700, Jose de Leon wrote:
> I'm using QMail 1.03, and using tcpserver instead of inetd. Linux 2.0.xx.
> Some POP3 account users are complaining of slow POP3 authentication. About
> 50% of the time, authentication times out. I have noticed the problem too,
> but once authenticated, download of email is quite fast.
This may also be a result of slow DNS and/or IDENT lookups:
- you may use the -R switch to disable IDENT lookups (very much recommended,
as most systems do not provide reliable info anyway).
- you may use the -H switch to disable remote host name lookups.
This speeds up connections if DNS is slow or broken for the IPs
your customers come from. It also is useless if the IPs do not have
PTR records.
Please note that these settings may also be useful if you start
qmail-smtpd via tcpserver.
> Are there not enough connections allocated for tcpserver? How can I check
> if maximum connections are being used?
start your tcpserver with -v switch and direct its output to a logfile.
There you should see messages like
tcpserver: status: 2/150
That means that currently 2 out of 150 max tcpservers are active.
The max limit can be increased with -c<num>, default is 40.
> Or are there settings in QMail itself I need to change?
No.
\Maex
--
SpaceNet GmbH | http://www.Space.Net/ | Yeah, yo mama dresses
Research & Development | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | you funny and you need
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 | Tel: +49 (89) 32356-0 | a mouse to delete files
D-80807 Muenchen | Fax: +49 (89) 32356-299 |
I'm back with my (unsolved) problem. It's clear from the answers I got
that I have failed in making myself understood. Mea culpa.
I will (re)state the context :
- My (very little) company has its own domain name, say "mycompany.pf"
(polyn�sie fran�aise)
- My company receives its inbound mail (from the Internet) thru 2
ISP-based POP mailboxes :
One is set-up to receive mail ONLY to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" (single
drop POP mailbox),
while the other one (the company's mailbox) is set up to receive all
the other mail to "mycompany.pf", such as "[EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]" and the like (multi drop POP mailbox).
- When jean wants to read his mail,
he simply dials the ISP, connects to the ISP pop server and
retrieves whatever message is in
his mailbox.
- When I want to retrieve my company's mail, I do exactly the same, but
with the second POP mailbox.
- When jean or I want to send mail, we simply use our MUA (such as
Netscape messenger) which is set up
to deliver outbound mail to our ISP mail relay, so jean and I can
exchange mail thru those ISP-based mailboxes
by using one anothers email address (Jean and I belong to the same
company, but work from different
locations)
- So far, so good ...
- Now, things have evolved on my side. I have setup a qmail server on my
LAN, and the
different computers on the LAN are now set up to have their MUA talk to
the qmail server (no longer the ISP mail server),
both to lookup their imap mailbox
and to deliver outbound messages. The current qmail configuration (
relay-agent + "mycompany.pf" in locals) allows
my local co-workers to exchange mail and to send mail to the Internet.
But we can NO LONGER send mail to jean' ISP-based Pop
mailbox using the address "[EMAIL PROTECTED]". Indeed, since
"mycompany.pf" is in "locals", qmail wants to deliver it
locally. THAT IS MY PROBLEM. You would say "well, open another account
with your ISP and get an address for jean
that would be outside the domain "mycompany.pf". THATS MY SECOND PROBLEM
: Jean wants to keep "[EMAIL PROTECTED]".
Indeed, he has lots of customers and friends who are already using this
address, so he does not want to change nor to use a second one!!!
(you can see : Jean is being very difficult and does not care much that
I have tried to set up
something new for the sake of my company's health. He says "it used to
work, so make it
work with your new setup..." well thats easy to say!).
So, how do I do it ? (so the coworkers on my LAN and I will still use
the address "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" to drop messages in jean remote
ISP-based
pop mailbox)
I hope I have been more clear this time.
Franck
begin:vcard
n:PORCHER;Franck
tel;work:(689) 56 23 95
x-mozilla-html:TRUE
url:http://www.esoft.pf/
org:Essential Software
adr:;;BP 4206 ;Papeete;Tahiti;98713;Polyn�sie fran�aise
version:2.1
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title:Fondateur & g�rant. Founder & Executive Director
x-mozilla-cpt:;2240
fn:Franck PORCHER
end:vcard
On Thu, Oct 14, 1999 at 06:42:04AM +0000, Franck PORCHER wrote:
I understand your question like this:
You want qmail to handle all local deliveries for mycompany.pf, with
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> being an exception.
Solution: Make sure you don't have a user account called "jean" on your
qmail server. Then put the address <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> in
"~alias/.qmail-jean", so qmail will forward mail for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. I'm assuming that your ISP will also accept mail for
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and be able to put it into jean's POP mailbox. Jean can
use his/her existing address, and everyone's happy.
This should work, but if it doesn't, we'll try and look for another
solution. Remember to address further queries not only to me, but to the
list too, because other cleverer people may have a better solution.
> I'm back with my (unsolved) problem. It's clear from the answers I got
> that I have failed in making myself understood. Mea culpa.
>
> I will (re)state the context :
> - My (very little) company has its own domain name, say "mycompany.pf"
> (polyn�sie fran�aise)
> - My company receives its inbound mail (from the Internet) thru 2
> ISP-based POP mailboxes :
> One is set-up to receive mail ONLY to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" (single
> drop POP mailbox),
> while the other one (the company's mailbox) is set up to receive all
> the other mail to "mycompany.pf", such as "[EMAIL PROTECTED],
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]" and the like (multi drop POP mailbox).
> - When jean wants to read his mail,
> he simply dials the ISP, connects to the ISP pop server and
> retrieves whatever message is in
> his mailbox.
> - When I want to retrieve my company's mail, I do exactly the same, but
> with the second POP mailbox.
> - When jean or I want to send mail, we simply use our MUA (such as
> Netscape messenger) which is set up
> to deliver outbound mail to our ISP mail relay, so jean and I can
> exchange mail thru those ISP-based mailboxes
> by using one anothers email address (Jean and I belong to the same
> company, but work from different
> locations)
> - So far, so good ...
> - Now, things have evolved on my side. I have setup a qmail server on my
> LAN, and the
> different computers on the LAN are now set up to have their MUA talk to
> the qmail server (no longer the ISP mail server),
> both to lookup their imap mailbox
> and to deliver outbound messages. The current qmail configuration (
> relay-agent + "mycompany.pf" in locals) allows
> my local co-workers to exchange mail and to send mail to the Internet.
> But we can NO LONGER send mail to jean' ISP-based Pop
> mailbox using the address "[EMAIL PROTECTED]". Indeed, since
> "mycompany.pf" is in "locals", qmail wants to deliver it
> locally. THAT IS MY PROBLEM. You would say "well, open another account
> with your ISP and get an address for jean
> that would be outside the domain "mycompany.pf". THATS MY SECOND PROBLEM
> : Jean wants to keep "[EMAIL PROTECTED]".
> Indeed, he has lots of customers and friends who are already using this
> address, so he does not want to change nor to use a second one!!!
> (you can see : Jean is being very difficult and does not care much that
> I have tried to set up
> something new for the sake of my company's health. He says "it used to
> work, so make it
> work with your new setup..." well thats easy to say!).
>
> So, how do I do it ? (so the coworkers on my LAN and I will still use
> the address "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" to drop messages in jean remote
> ISP-based
> pop mailbox)
>
> I hope I have been more clear this time.
>
> Franck
>
Content-Description: Card for Franck PORCHER
--
See complete headers for more info
Hello
I have 2 RedHat 6.0 servers running qmail. One have installed the
rpm qmail-1.03-14ucspi and the other have the qmail-1.03-
102memphis.
When I try to use Peter Samuel Vacation program on the Memphis
package PC I got the following error in the qmail log and no
vacation message is sent:
>939620707.238895 status: local 1/10 remote 0/20
>939620710.595702 delivery 1: success: qmail->
> inject:_fatal:_read_error/did_1+0+1/
>939620710.620806 status: local 0/10 remote 0/20
On the Ucspi package PC everything is okay!
I have looked at permissions "everywhere" and can not find any
problem so far.
Vennlig hilsen
Jon Lur�s
Lur data
Mob: 91 60 69 62
Hi ALl,
I am using QMAIL to send verify email to users registered in my website.no problem
except one website.I am send the email via a perl script via open(MAIL, "|$SENDMAIL -t
-oi") ,$SENDMAIL is /usr/sbin/sendmail and was link to /var/qmail/bin/sendmail.
the problem is when I send to [EMAIL PROTECTED](NOTE:not problem about that domain
name,when I send to [EMAIL PROTECTED],its OK)
the error msg return by my QMAIL is as following:
Hi. This is the qmail-send program at qiji.com.
I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses.
This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
202.96.44.17 failed after I sent the message.
Remote host said: 552 message is not welcome to our host,maybe too big (#5.3.4)
--- Below this line is a copy of the message.
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: (qmail 7854 invoked by uid 99); 14 Oct 1999 08:26:57 -0000
Date: 14 Oct 1999 08:26:57 -0000
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: WELCOME.....
..........
.........
...
OK.I have 2 question.
1.the verify is less than 1K,why got 552 message?I'd check it w/ my own account there
and my mailbox is empty there so its not really exceed the box size.
2.weird problem is that,when I resend this email via my own account in my server,via
hmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
to that [EMAIL PROTECTED],its OK!.why?
Thanks in advance!
--
����(Mr. Li Hong)
==========================================
�漣����, Internet Miracle China
�����ഺ, �漣����
==========================================
http://www.qiji.com/
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Office:(010)86251065
Cell: 13001051160
