Looks to be a flashnet dialup in LA..which if so means this person can be pursued
legally per Gov. Wilsons spam bill
(http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/97-98/bill/asm/ab_1651-1700/ab_1676_bill_19980928_chaptered.html).
If anyone really wishes to make flash.net's day, there is your door.
Steve
"Edward S. Marshall" wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Oct 1999, Mate Wierdl wrote:
> > This guy seems to be originating from flash.net. While
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] was working a month ago, it seems to be /dev/null now.
> > Is flash.net already in rbl?
>
> Wouldn't matter, this came directly from a dialup there, not their mail
> servers. The RBL wouldn't catch that, nor should it, because that is
> beyond their scope.
>
> It is, however, listed by the MAPS DUL (http://www.maps.org/dul/), which
> is managed by the same folks as the original RBL. If you were using the
> DUL listing as well, you never would have seen it...
>
> $ rblcheck 209.30.74.44
> 209.30.74.44 not RBL filtered by rbl.maps.vix.com
> 209.30.74.44 RBL filtered by dul.maps.vix.com
> 209.30.74.44 not RBL filtered by relays.orbs.org
> [...snip...]
>
> > How does one check?
>
> Snag a copy of rblcheck; makes these kind of lookups very easy:
>
> http://www.xnet.com/~emarshal/rblcheck/
>
> (And yes, I'll hopefully have a new release out soon. Working for a living
> and hobbies of any kind don't seem to mix well... ;-)
>
> --
> Edward S. Marshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ What goes up, must come down. ]
> http://www.logic.net/~emarshal/ [ Ask any system administrator. ]
