Dave Sill wrote: > Say you send a message to a list of 10,000 addresses using > sendmail. What's the first thing it does? It looks up the MX for each > recipient so it can sort by MX and minimize the number of connections. Why is that? Lets say you have to deliver to [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] Why wouldn't a well-written mta assume that the MX for aol.com is most likely going to be the same as for aol.com, and aol.com? If the MX lookup is done after sorting by domain wouldn't that reduce dns traffic? Regards, --Steve
- Re: qmail remote delivery logic Russell Nelson
- Re: qmail remote delivery logic David Dyer-Bennet
- Re: qmail remote delivery logic Frank Tegtmeyer
- Re: qmail remote delivery logic Pavel Kankovsky
- Re: qmail remote delivery logic Dave Sill
- Re: qmail remote delivery logic Pavel Kankovsky
- Re: qmail remote delivery logic Dave Sill
- Re: qmail remote delivery logic David L. Nicol
- Re: qmail remote delivery logic John White
- Re: qmail remote delivery logic John White
- Re: qmail remote delivery logic Steve Vertigan
- Re: qmail remote delivery logic Dave Sill
- Re: qmail remote delivery logic Stefan Paletta
- Re: qmail remote delivery logic Sam
- Re: qmail remote delivery logic Dave Sill
- Re: qmail remote delivery logic Dave Sill
- Re: qmail remote delivery logic Sam
- Re: qmail remote delivery logic Russell Nelson
- Big DNS-patch also for t-online.de required Frank Tegtmeyer
- Re: Big DNS-patch also for t-online.de requ... D. J. Bernstein
- Re: Big DNS-patch also for t-online.de requ... Frank Tegtmeyer
