"Peter C. Norton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Post.Office is simple, it runs under NT, any idiot can set it up, and it's
>user interface is better then the current web-configurators for
>qmail/sendmail/anything else I've seen.
Those are the pluses.
>It's also crappy. Delivery is slow, can't grow well past about 200
>users, can't handle large volumes of email, doesn't log nearly enough
>data to track a message. It's capable of losing messages in daily
>operations.
Those are the minuses.
>In other words, beats me [why Post.Office is so popular].
It's no mystery: NT is popular, idiots abound, and everyone likes a
pretty [inter]face.
The fact that it's crappy is obviously secondary to these concerns.
-Dave
