On Sun, Dec 19, 1999 at 09:38:01PM +0100, bert hubert wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 19, 1999 at 09:06:42PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Hmm... NFS is kind of a legacy thing in our company, I'd rather get rid of it
> > too, but I'm not the one deciding stuff like that. So I just build a qmail
> > solution that fits perfectly :)
>
> /* NFS dorks */
>
> (read the source :-))
I always do :)
> > > easy to continue adding boxes. Also lots cheaper than the NetCrap approach.
> >
> > Well on our system there's also a website 'n stuff for each user, which makes
> > it a bit more complicated.
>
> No it doesn't the idea that homedirectory and mail are somehow related is
> somewhat outdated. It's quite easy to make web interface that replaces the
> .forward capabilities.
legacy is the word... :(
> > it doesn't apply to Linux. Our setup is not hybrid whatsoever (not yet,
> > perhaps) so we don't need to worry about different OSes.
>
> Only recently has the Linux NFS support come of age. I would advise on
> interrogating the NetApp people (say hi to them for me :-)) on the
> experiences wrt Linux.
I'll troll my coworkers to do so :)
Greetz, Peter.
--
Peter van Dijk - student/sysadmin/ircoper/womanizer/pretending coder
|
| 'C makes it easy to shoot yourself in the foot;
| C++ makes it harder, but when you do it blows your whole leg off.'
| Bjarne Stroustrup, Inventor of C++
