>Received: from muncher.math.uic.edu (muncher.math.uic.edu [131.193.178.181]) > by mxb.atmajaya.ac.id (2.6 Build 1 (Berkeley 8.8.6)/8.8.4) with SMTP > id QAA00475 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 21 Dec 1999 >16:22:53 +0700 >Received: (qmail 6765 invoked by uid 1002); 21 Dec 1999 09:26:34 -0000 >Mailing-List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm >Precedence: bulk >Delivered-To: mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Received: (qmail 3781 invoked from network); 21 Dec 1999 09:26:32 -0000 >Received: from 1cust184.tnt4.nyc3.da.uu.net (HELO in2.ibm.net) (63.23.114.184) > by muncher.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 21 Dec 1999 09:26:32 -0000 >From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Date: Tue, 21 Dec 1999 00:50:04 >Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Save 50-80% on International Calls and Win $500 in Free phone calls! >Mime-Version: 1.0 >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > It seems that this mailling list should subscribe to DUL service (see http://www.mail-abuse.org/dul) to prevent direct to MX spamming like this (PS: this person use UU.net and telnet to muncher.math.uic.edu port 25 to send email to this mailling list, if this mailling list use DUL service, than he wouldn't do this, since his connection would be refused)
