qmail Digest 11 Jan 2000 11:00:01 -0000 Issue 877

Topics (messages 35284 through 35307):

Resend already delivered mail
        35284 by: Puck
        35285 by: Russell Nelson

smtp-poplock: installation probs
        35286 by: Dave Kitabjian
        35287 by: David Harris

Re: Relay Problem- Problem resoulving hos-
        35288 by: Dave Sill

can't use courier imapd (imap server for qmail) on solaris 7
        35289 by: Max Shaposhnikov
        35290 by: John P. Looney

sorry about my prev. message - i don't understand imap4 protocol at first time... 
but...
        35291 by: Max Shaposhnikov

Migrating to qmail
        35292 by: Ari Arantes Filho

Re: Netscape Authentication Problem
        35293 by: Roger Merchberger
        35294 by: Timothy L. Mayo

Re: qmail-qlint 0.55
        35295 by: Jon Rust

Summary: Netscape Authentication Problem
        35296 by: Roger Merchberger

Re: qmail-lint 0.55
        35297 by: Russell Nelson

Re: What MUA do you use?
        35298 by: Chris Garrigues

Why many .qmail files in $HOME?
        35299 by: Giles Lean
        35300 by: Vern Hart

Re: [vmailmgr] Summary: Netscape Authentication Problem
        35301 by: Bruce Guenter

qmail-forwarding
        35302 by: Michael Mayer

Mail Cleaner script
        35303 by: Mark Wagner
        35304 by: Fabrice Scemama

Re: dot-qmail with virtualdomains
        35305 by: John L. Fjellstad

New SMTP setup
        35306 by: Kevin Waterson

qmail vs. sendmail weirdness
        35307 by: jay

Administrivia:

To unsubscribe from the digest, e-mail:
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To subscribe to the digest, e-mail:
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To bug my human owner, e-mail:
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To post to the list, e-mail:
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]


----------------------------------------------------------------------


Hi there,

now i came across that i need to resend mail for a user.
The mails are already in the ./Maildir/ directory but i have
to resend them again.
I know qmail-inject can do this, but i have to give an recipient to qmail-inject.
Does someone have a script (perl, shell ...) that parses every message in a directory
and resends it by using the original recipient. Doing this by hand would take ages ...

Please do your best (as ever),
  Thomas





Puck writes:
 > Hi there,
 > 
 > now i came across that i need to resend mail for a user.  The mails
 > are already in the ./Maildir/ directory but i have to resend them
 > again.  I know qmail-inject can do this, but i have to give an
 > recipient to qmail-inject.  Does someone have a script (perl, shell
 > ...) that parses every message in a directory and resends it by
 > using the original recipient. Doing this by hand would take ages

Maildirsmtp.  It's in Dan's serialmail package, found on
koobera^H^H^H^H^H^H^Hcr.yp.to.

-- 
-russ nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  http://russnelson.com
Crynwr sells support for free software  | PGPok | "Ask not what your country
521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315 268 1925 voice | can force other people to
Potsdam, NY 13676-3213  | +1 315 268 9201 FAX   | do for you..."  -Perry M.





For some reason, all mail to "drh.net" has been expiring and returning to 
me for weeks. So I'm posting this here hoping that either Dave Harris is 
still subscribed or one of you folks might be able to help me with 
smtp-poplock. Here goes!

We have a need for smtp-poplock right now, and we're anxiously
configuring it trying to get it working. Let me share a few
comments/problems. I'd greatly value your feedback/assistance!

-----------------------------------------
1. Perms on checkfifo

I don't understand why you "chmod 644 checkfifo". In order to run it, I
have to "chmod 755" or else it's not executable.

-----------------------------------------
2. checkfifo fails unless readlog is running. It gives the error:

bsd# /usr/src/smtp-poplock-2.04/checkfifo ./fifo
error opening fifo: Device not configured at
/usr/src/smtp-poplock-2.04/checkfifo line 16.

However, it's worth mentioning that checkfifo does indeed pass the test if
readlog is running. Also, running "fifo-safety" had no impact on this
behavior.

-----------------------------------------
3. Furthermore, checkfifo KILLS readlog every time.

In case it helps, here's what things look like after "make install":

bsd# pwd
/var/smtp-poplock
bsd# ls -l
total 0
-rw-r--r--  1 root  wheel  0 Dec 30 11:35 dbfile
prw-------  1 root  wheel  0 Dec 30 12:11 fifo

-----------------------------------------
4. /var/run/readlog.pid

This file never appears to be created:

bsd# /usr/sbin/readlog-starter restart
cat: /var/run/readlog.pid: No such file or directory
usage: kill [-s signal_name] pid ...
       kill -l [exit_status]
       kill -signal_name pid ...
       kill -signal_number pid ...

-----------------------------------------
5. /usr/sbin/logpopauth-pre hangs POP

After

USER joe
+OK
PASS schmo

there is no reply; the POP session is hung. Here is how it's running:

#!/bin/sh
/usr/local/bin/tcpserver -c 600 0 110 \
   /var/qmail/bin/qmail-popup `hostname` \
   /usr/sbin/logpopauth-pre \
   /bin/checkpassword \
   /usr/bin/logpopauth-post \
   /var/qmail/bin/qmail-pop3d ./Maildir &

All the other problems might be ignorable, but this one is a show-stopper.
-----------------------------------------

I'd value any suggestions or questions you have. Thanks!!

Dave







> For some reason, all mail to "drh.net" has been expiring and returning to
> me for weeks. So I'm posting this here hoping that either Dave Harris is
> still subscribed or one of you folks might be able to help me with
> smtp-poplock. Here goes!

That's not good. I've not known about any drh.net e-mail problems. Please
forward me some of these error messages at davideousNOSPAM @ yahoo.com. (Of
course, remove the "NOSPAM" from the e-mail address.)

> We have a need for smtp-poplock right now, and we're anxiously
> configuring it trying to get it working. Let me share a few
> comments/problems. I'd greatly value your feedback/assistance!

First, make sure you are running the latest version: smtp-poplock-2.04. You
probably are.. but just checking.

> -----------------------------------------
> 1. Perms on checkfifo
>
> I don't understand why you "chmod 644 checkfifo". In order to run it, I
> have to "chmod 755" or else it's not executable.

Ok. That's a bug. That will be fixed in the next version. Thanks for the heads
up.

> -----------------------------------------
> 2. checkfifo fails unless readlog is running. It gives the error:
>
> bsd# /usr/src/smtp-poplock-2.04/checkfifo ./fifo
> error opening fifo: Device not configured at
> /usr/src/smtp-poplock-2.04/checkfifo line 16.
>
> However, it's worth mentioning that checkfifo does indeed pass the test if
> readlog is running. Also, running "fifo-safety" had no impact on this
> behavior.

Checkfifo does the following: it writes data to the fifo until it gets filled
up and blocks on writing, then it waits 90 seconds, and then checks to see if
it can write to the fifo. This is a check to make sure that the fifo will be
cleared if readlog is not running. It is just a test of fifo-safety, really.
So, disable readlog, enable fifo-safety, and give checkfifo a try.

> -----------------------------------------
> 3. Furthermore, checkfifo KILLS readlog every time.
>
> In case it helps, here's what things look like after "make install":
>
> bsd# pwd
> /var/smtp-poplock
> bsd# ls -l
> total 0
> -rw-r--r--  1 root  wheel  0 Dec 30 11:35 dbfile
> prw-------  1 root  wheel  0 Dec 30 12:11 fifo

Readlog was never intended to be running during a checkfifo run. Results are
undefined.

> -----------------------------------------
> 4. /var/run/readlog.pid
>
> This file never appears to be created:
>
> bsd# /usr/sbin/readlog-starter restart
> cat: /var/run/readlog.pid: No such file or directory
> usage: kill [-s signal_name] pid ...
>        kill -l [exit_status]
>        kill -signal_name pid ...
>        kill -signal_number pid ...

What is your value for $pidfile from /etc/smtp-poplock.conf?

> -----------------------------------------
> 5. /usr/sbin/logpopauth-pre hangs POP
>
> After
>
> USER joe
> +OK
> PASS schmo
>
> there is no reply; the POP session is hung. Here is how it's running:
>
> #!/bin/sh
> /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -c 600 0 110 \
>    /var/qmail/bin/qmail-popup `hostname` \
>    /usr/sbin/logpopauth-pre \
>    /bin/checkpassword \
>    /usr/bin/logpopauth-post \
>    /var/qmail/bin/qmail-pop3d ./Maildir &
>
> All the other problems might be ignorable, but this one is a show-stopper.

Can you give me a nested process listing (like 'ps -axf' on linux)  so that I
can see where this has hung? Also, it's very important to have your values for
the logpopauth_where, readfile, readfile_isfifo configuration variables and
which data passing method from the INSTALL file you chose to implement.

Also, have you checked to make sure that POP works properly when logpopauth-pre
and logpopauth-post are removed?

> -----------------------------------------
>
> I'd value any suggestions or questions you have. Thanks!!
>
> Dave

 - David Harris
   Principal Engineer, DRH Internet Services






Joseph Francois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>Hello I'm having problem relaying e-mail via my qmail host. I check on my 
>Network configuration and evrything works fine. here is the error message I
>get.
>
>Jan  7 12:28:13 access1 qmail: 947266093.465598 delivery 11: failure:
>Sorry,_I_couldn't_find_any_host_named_usa.net?._(#5.1.2)/

Sounds like you're setting RELAYCLIENT to something other than "".

>From the qmail-smtpd man page:

       rcpthosts
            Allowed  RCPT  domains.   If  rcpthosts  is supplied,
            qmail-smtpd  will  reject  any   envelope   recipient
            address with a domain not listed in rcpthosts.

            Exception: If the environment variable RELAYCLIENT is
            set, qmail-smtpd  will  ignore  rcpthosts,  and  will
            append  the  value  of  RELAYCLIENT  to each incoming
            recipient address.

Note the last bit there about appending the value to recipient
addresses.

-Dave




after compilling and running - all is fine
but  when i try to connect to server from clients - nothing not happen
- timeout...
i try to telnet sun:143
result:

Escape character is '^]'.
* OK Courier-IMAP ready. Copyright 1998-1999 Double Precision, Inc.  See COPYING for 
distribution information.
login shapa test
login NO Error in IMAP command received by server.

- as i can see IMAP server doesn't understand login command! ;-(

what can i do?






On Mon, Jan 10, 2000 at 07:32:53PM +0300, Max Shaposhnikov mentioned:
> after compilling and running - all is fine
> but  when i try to connect to server from clients - nothing not happen
> - timeout...
> i try to telnet sun:143
> result:
> 
> Escape character is '^]'.
> * OK Courier-IMAP ready. Copyright 1998-1999 Double Precision, Inc.  See COPYING for 
>distribution information.
> login shapa test
> login NO Error in IMAP command received by server.
> 
> - as i can see IMAP server doesn't understand login command! ;-(

 Try:

1 login shapa test

 unlike POP, IMAP wants a command sequence number.

Kate

-- 
Microsoft. The best reason in the world to drink beer.
http://www.redbrick.dcu.ie/~valen

PGP signature





another telnet chat

Escape character is '^]'.
* OK Courier-IMAP ready. Copyright 1998-1999 Double Precision, Inc.  See COPYING for 
distribution information.
a001 login shapa test
Connection closed by foreign host

server disconnect me....
wihtout any pause...






Hi,

I'm trying to migrate to qmail. I'm using emwac for windows. I've copyed a
single user's message to its maildir/new directory. The emwac also works
with maildir, so each message is a single file in the user maildir
directory.

With outlook express, it's ok. But with netscape mail it's not working. The
mail client can read the messages, but the subject, from and date are blank.
When I click to read the message it shows all the body, without processing
it.

What should I do?

Best regards,

Ari







I apologize for the OT post, but I do need help *badly* if anyone else out
there has run into this, I most certainly would appreciate a helping hand...

I;m running qmail 1.03 and have set up vmailmgr correctly (well, it's
working.. ;-) and have telnetted to port 110 and POP3 is working correctly,
and set up IE correctly and had it send/receive mail to virtual accounts.

However, when I put in a virtual user, say... [EMAIL PROTECTED] in
Netscape (ver. 4.5 thru 4.7) it barfs and says that the authentication
failed. I have tried several different escape characters in place (or in
addition to) the '@' symbol, with no luck.

Yes, I do realize that this isn't technically a vmailmgr/qmail problem, and
the software is great... However, I have searched deja.com, Altavista & the
ORNL qmail archives with no success - does anyone have a fix for this (I
can and will recompile with the ':' virtual domain separator if need be,
but I'd rather fix Nutscrape.)

The customer I'm dealing with will not switch their email program, either. :-/

Thanks in advance for any and all help,
Roger "Merch" Merchberger
--
Roger "Merch" Merchberger   ---   sysadmin, Iceberg Computers
Recycling is good, right???  Ok, so I'll recycle an old .sig.

If at first you don't succeed, nuclear warhead
disarmament should *not* be your first career choice.




Replace the '@' with a '%'.

On Mon, 10 Jan 2000, Roger Merchberger wrote:

> I apologize for the OT post, but I do need help *badly* if anyone else out
> there has run into this, I most certainly would appreciate a helping hand...
> 
> I;m running qmail 1.03 and have set up vmailmgr correctly (well, it's
> working.. ;-) and have telnetted to port 110 and POP3 is working correctly,
> and set up IE correctly and had it send/receive mail to virtual accounts.
> 
> However, when I put in a virtual user, say... [EMAIL PROTECTED] in
> Netscape (ver. 4.5 thru 4.7) it barfs and says that the authentication
> failed. I have tried several different escape characters in place (or in
> addition to) the '@' symbol, with no luck.
> 
> Yes, I do realize that this isn't technically a vmailmgr/qmail problem, and
> the software is great... However, I have searched deja.com, Altavista & the
> ORNL qmail archives with no success - does anyone have a fix for this (I
> can and will recompile with the ':' virtual domain separator if need be,
> but I'd rather fix Nutscrape.)
> 
> The customer I'm dealing with will not switch their email program, either. :-/
> 
> Thanks in advance for any and all help,
> Roger "Merch" Merchberger
> --
> Roger "Merch" Merchberger   ---   sysadmin, Iceberg Computers
> Recycling is good, right???  Ok, so I'll recycle an old .sig.
> 
> If at first you don't succeed, nuclear warhead
> disarmament should *not* be your first career choice.
> 

---------------------------------
Timothy L. Mayo                         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior Systems Administrator
localconnect(sm)
http://www.localconnect.net/

The National Business Network Inc.      http://www.nb.net/
One Monroeville Center, Suite 850
Monroeville, PA  15146
(412) 810-8888 Phone
(412) 810-8886 Fax





At 9:53 PM -0500 1/8/00, Russell Nelson wrote:
>I've released qmail-qlint 0.55.  Giles Lean suggested that a null
>virtualdomains left-hand-side shouldn't be expected to be in
>rcpthosts.
>
>    http://qmail.org/qmail-qlint-0.55

Am I the only one getting a 404 on this? I think it should be:

     http://qmail.org/qmail-lint-0.55

jon




Rumor has it that Bruno Dalapicola Bergamaschi de Souza may have mentioned
these words:

> Tha's because netscape doesn't accept a username containing a @
> Try using test#virdomain.zzz instead of [EMAIL PROTECTED]

And Timothy Mayo mentioned on the qmail list:

> Replace the '@' with a '%'.

Well, the '@' symbol is what the folks are "expecting" and didn't want to
recompile if I could help it... but it seems I'd read the doc's wrong and
you can use either default separator simultaneously (which I didn't know
before.) The default separators are '@' and ':', and the colon did work
with netscape without a recompile.

Thanks again for all your help and quick responses,

Roger "Merch" Merchberger
--
Roger "Merch" Merchberger   ---   sysadmin, Iceberg Computers
Recycling is good, right???  Ok, so I'll recycle an old .sig.

If at first you don't succeed, nuclear warhead
disarmament should *not* be your first career choice.




Jon Rust writes:
 > Am I the only one getting a 404 on this? I think it should be:
 > 
 >      http://qmail.org/qmail-lint-0.55

Sigh.  The link on the web page is fine, I just mis-quoted it.  One of 
these days I have to write a qmail-queue wrapper which checks all URLs 
on outgoing mail to verify that they don't return a 404 error.  :)

-- 
-russ nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  http://russnelson.com
Crynwr sells support for free software  | PGPok | "Ask not what your country
521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315 268 1925 voice | can force other people to
Potsdam, NY 13676-3213  | +1 315 268 9201 FAX   | do for you..."  -Perry M.




> From:  Andy Bradford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date:  Fri, 07 Jan 2000 12:39:00 -0700
>
> I used exmh.  It is a fairly configureable MUA and will do most of what 
> you want.  I don't read a lot of newsgroups so I don't now if it will 
> handle those the way you like or not...

It minimal, but it does what I want for news.  (Or rather, the latest version 
does, due to some patches that I made.)

If you want to read a small number of news groups as if they were a mailing 
list and are capable of remembering to click 'post' instead of 'send', it 
works good enough. 

If I ever have time again, I'd like to merge the 'post' and 'send' buttons to do
the right thing in each context, but...more important and more interesting things
are on my platter.

Chris

-- 
Chris Garrigues                 virCIO
http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/   http://www.virCIO.Com
+1 512 432 4046                 +1 512 374 0500
                                4314 Avenue C
O-                              Austin, TX  78751-3709
                                

  My email address is an experiment in SPAM elimination.  For an
  explanation of what we're doing, see http://www.DeepEddy.Com/tms.html 

    Nobody ever got fired for buying Microsoft,
      but they could get fired for relying on Microsoft.


PGP signature






[I'm sure this has been discussed before.  If someone is better than I
 am at nagivating the archives and can find a discussion, please point
 me at it.  Thanks.]

One regular sticking point for user (rather than administrator)
acceptance of qmail is that all the .qmail-* files a user creates go
in $HOME.

Personally I've "just got used to it", but wonder if anyone has worked
out if there is a good reason for this that would not be addressed by
putting the per-user control files into a subdirectory?

Perhaps a possible syntax could be:

.qmail      file, as currently used
.qmail-/    directory, containing files as currently named but with
            the extra "/" e.g. $HOME/.qmail-/default

Thoughts, anyone?

Regards,

Giles







On Tomorrow, Giles Lean wrote:
> 
> One regular sticking point for user (rather than administrator)
> acceptance of qmail is that all the .qmail-* files a user creates go
> in $HOME.

I like a clean home dir as well.  Which is why, for myself, I have
added to users/assign:

   =vern:vern:2244:18:/home/vern:::
   +vern-:vern:2244:18:/home/vern:s/::

(Don't forget the dot (.) on the last line of the file.)

This puts .qmail and .qmail-default in my home directory but
everything else is in .qmails/

Works great.  This changes ~/.qmail-foo to ~/.qmails/foo and really
cleans up my home directory.

Cheers,
Vern
-- 
\ \   / __| _ \  \ |   Vern Hart
 \ \ /  _|    / .  |   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  \_/  ___|_|_\_|\_|






On Mon, Jan 10, 2000 at 01:12:08PM -0500, Roger Merchberger wrote:
> Well, the '@' symbol is what the folks are "expecting" and didn't want to
> recompile if I could help it... but it seems I'd read the doc's wrong and
> you can use either default separator simultaneously (which I didn't know
> before.) The default separators are '@' and ':', and the colon did work
> with netscape without a recompile.

You don't need to recompile vmailmgr to allow other seperators, it's a
config file.
-- 
Bruce Guenter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>                       http://em.ca/~bruceg/




Michael Mayer wrote:

Hi
I'm using qmail 1.03-9.i386.rpm on my computer and it works fine so
far...

but one problem is heavy: When I let my eMail from Host A be forwarded to
Host B running both qmail, then Host A gets a connection to HostB but
dies before delivery...

Host A says

    Connected to Host A but connection died (#4.4.2

My syslog on Host B tells refused connect from Host A

Does anyone know any solution ?

Thanks in advance...

   Michael






Hi all,

Just wanted to let everyone know that I wrote a script that goes through
the cur directories and removes email that is over 30 days old.

It also sends emails to the user warning him/her of the upcoming
removal 5,3,and 1 day before removal and also sends a letter after 
removal stating how many messages where removed.

you can find the RPM, tar.gz, and the script at www.oralinux.org
under the SysAdmin Section

When we put it into production it cleaned up 2 gigs worth of email
that was being stored on our system.

Mark
-- 
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Mark Wagner - Cyber Trails                     Phone - (602)906-1751
Oracle DBA / Systems Administrator             Pager - (602)521-4280
[EMAIL PROTECTED]                           Fax   - (602)907-1799
*                       www.oralinux.org                           *
*       Evil Lord of the Sysadmin Sith Darth cat*|/dev/audio       *
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Who are you? where are we going? and why are we in this handbasket?
Signatures are like bumperstickers for geeks.




Mark Wagner wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> Just wanted to let everyone know that I wrote a script that goes through
> the cur directories and removes email that is over 30 days old.
> 
> It also sends emails to the user warning him/her of the upcoming
> removal 5,3,and 1 day before removal and also sends a letter after
> removal stating how many messages where removed.
(...)

Will you warn them too before removing these 3 mails, using 9 mails? :))
Just kidding --I'm sure you don't.

/Fabrice




Hi Joel,

Actually, I already tried what you suggested, and it didn't work (which
is why I posted on the mailing list). What happens is when qmail hits
.qmail-user1, it will rewrite the receiver's email address according to
the instructions in that file.  So, [EMAIL PROTECTED], will hit
.qmail-user-default (not .qmail-user), and the receiptor will be
rewritten as [EMAIL PROTECTED] (which takes away the user-email
account I wanted to reach in the first place).

I'm wondering if the solution is not to put all the domains I want in
the "locals" file in /var/qmail/control.

Any reasons why this shouldn't be done?  Only restrictions seem to be
that someone in domain1 can't have the same username as domain2

Joel Shellman wrote:
> 
> "John L. Fjellstad" wrote:
> >
> > Hi Joel,
> >
> > Thanks, that answers half of my questions.  I still have my original
> > problem, though, which was to give the user dot-qmail (alias) control.
> >
> > Example of what I mean:
> > I have an account [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > I like to create a (very small) mailing list using the qmail mechanism,
> > something like [EMAIL PROTECTED] stored in .qmail-list.
> > I want to let the users create the dot-qmail files in their home
> > directories, but the below suggestion looks like they have to access to
> > the ~domain-user directory?  Is it possible to give them 'normal'
> > dot-qmail features?
> >
> > Any suggestions?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Joel Shellman wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > In the virtualdomains file you have something like:
> > > domain1.com:username1
> > > domain2.com:username2
> > > domain3.com:username3
> > >
> > > Then you have the .qmail-whatever's in the three user's home
> > > directories.
> > <snip snip>
> > > ~username2/.qmail
> > > ~username2/.qmail-whatever3
> > > ~username2/.qmail-whatever4
> > > etc.
> >
> 
> Did you find the answer to your question yet? What you mention is a
> little complicated but I believe you can do it by using something like
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Then in virtualhosts
> domain.com:domainuser
> 
> then in domainuser's directory:
> .qmail-user
> and that file contains:
> &finaluser
> 
> and in finaluser's directory:
> .qmail-user-email
> which contains wherever you wanted [EMAIL PROTECTED] to go
> 
> I believe something like that will work.


-- 
John______________________________________________________________________
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.bayarea.net/~jfjellst/
work: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
icq: thales @ 17755648




I am setting up  a new qmail server to act as our smtp

the system is a newly installed RedHat 6.1 on a dual P133 SCSI
I hope to add a POP to it when this is done.

This is the commands I used to install it using the rpms...

rpm -e exmh
rpm -e nmh
rpm -e mutt
rpm -e fetchmail
rpm -e sendmail
rpm -Uvh daemontools-*.i386.rpm
rpm -Uvh daemontools-*.i386.rpm
rpm -Uvh ucspi-tcp-*.i386.rpm
rpm -Uvh var-qmail-create-1.03-102memphis.src.rpm
rpm -bb /usr/src/redhat/SPECS/var-qmail-create.spec
rpm -Uvh
/usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/var-qmail-create-1.03-102memphis.i386.rpm
cp var-qmail-1.03-2-gnu-linux-i686.tar.gz /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/
rpm -bb var-qmail.spec
rpm -Uvh /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/qmail-1.03-102memphis.i386.rpm
rpm -Uvh qmail-run-4-4.i386.rpm
rpm -Uvh qmailanalog-*.i386.rpm
rpm -Uvh tcpserver-initscripts-*.i386.rpm
rpm -Uvh checkpassword-0.81-2.i386.rpm

I then editted /var/qmail/rc to read
qmail-start ./Maildir/ splogger qmail
for Maildir support

This is not working
Is their something I have missed here?
When I do ps aux it shows no daemons running and I cannot get
echo to: user | /var/qmail/bin/qmail-inject to deliver to a useer

kind regards
Kevin






Alright, here's the situation.

I set up vpopmail for pop accounts, and qmailadmin to manage
those accounts.  I set up an account [EMAIL PROTECTED]

I added that pop user to my mail client, and sent out a few
messages to test.  When I send a message to a domain that
uses sendmail, I get a bounce saying:

<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ... Domain must exist

Simple question.  WTF?

All of the other domains I sent it to worked fine (hotmail,
a few boxes I set qmail up on, a few domains that use
alternative mail clients)

Any reason why this is happening?  Thanks.




Reply via email to