On Thu, Jan 20, 2000 at 01:32:53PM -0500, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>    From: Russell Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>    Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2000 13:22:56 -0500 (EST)
> 
>    Mark Delany writes:
>     > I walk around http://physics.nist.gov/GenInt/Time/world.html
>     > might be instructive.
> 
>    Instructive, yes, but it says nothing about TAI.  TAI is simply a
>    counting of seconds, without UTC being taken into account.  TAI + leap 
>    seconds == UTC.  Unix machines claim to run on UTC but really operate
>    on TAI.
> 
> This is one of those statement which punches my personal pedant
> button.
> 
> I believe that machines which follow POSIX run on a mixture.

I wouldn't want to run any 100% POSIX-compliant OS.

Why? POSIX says 2000 is not a leap year :)

Greetz, Peter.
-- 
Peter van Dijk - student/sysadmin/ircoper/madly in love/pretending coder 
|  
| 'C makes it easy to shoot yourself in the foot;
|  C++ makes it harder, but when you do it blows your whole leg off.'
|                             Bjarne Stroustrup, Inventor of C++

Reply via email to