> OK, I've already found that and turned it on. It's better, but it
> still leaves a lot of addresses uncloaked.
>
> Now, how can I reprocess the existing archives with -spammode?
Use a different archival program. : )
These questions aren't directly related to QMail, but they do have some
relevance to the topic, so I'll plead for forgiveness.
It seems like there isn't any decent mail archiving system out there.
Some, like MoHnArc (or however you spell it) have some neat features, but
there aren't any that really kick butt. A while ago, I started writing my
own archiving program for a mailing list that I'm on, using PostgreSQL for
the storage. Having it in a database really allows for great flexibility
in archival/retrieval. There's just one problem... threading. I've been
trying to come up with a decent method of threading the messages, but since
few (if any) mail clients seem to use a "in-response-to" header (or
whatever the name of it is), it's getting very hard to do more than just
seperate the original from a reply.
If anybody wants to help me out, maybe I'll archive the QMail list once
I get the package done. (There, does that justify asking this on the QMail
list?) As far as spam harvesting, the database stores the email address of
the author, but does not show it to end users. One of the planned features
is the ability to email the author via a form, so that you never see the
email address in question. It allows for contacting authors, but without
opening them up to spam. The author can decide whether to reply or not.
steve
