On Thu, Feb 03, 2000 at 08:51:17PM +0100, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> 2. *BSD FFS (with and without softupdates) honors fsync() for data
> AND metadata in any case.
>
> -> The fsync() call returns when the data and metadata is written
> to the disk.
>
> == reliable for DJB
Why does he say not to use softupdates then?
I guess the main point is that any filesystem that honors fsync()
for data and metadata is okay.
Neil
- Re: Linux kernel turning for mail performance? Jeremy Hansen
- Re: Linux kernel turning for mail performance? Len Budney
- Re: Linux kernel turning for mail performance? Derek Callaway
- Re: Linux kernel turning for mail performance? petervd
- Re: Linux kernel turning for mail performance? Len Budney
- Re: Linux kernel turning for mail performance... cmikk
- Re: Linux kernel turning for mail performance... nascheme
- Re: Linux kernel turning for mail perform... cmikk
- Re: Linux kernel turning for mail perform... nascheme
- Re: Linux kernel turning for mail perform... Andre Oppermann
- Re: Linux kernel turning for mail perform... nascheme
- Re: Linux kernel turning for mail perform... cmikk
- Re: Linux kernel turning for mail perform... Russell Nelson
- OT: fsync semantics (was Re: Linux kernel... cmikk
- Re: OT: fsync semantics (was Re: Linux ke... Russell Nelson
- Re: OT: fsync semantics (was Re: Linux ke... cmikk
- Re: OT: fsync semantics (was Re: Linux ke... Russell Nelson
- Re: OT: fsync semantics (was Re: Linux ke... craig
- Re: OT: fsync semantics (was Re: Linux ke... Russell Nelson
- Egg on my face Russell Nelson
- Re: Egg on my face Russell Nelson
