At 10:51 AM 2/9/00 , Greg Owen wrote: [snip] >> >> Security by obscurity is NO solution to security problems. It >> keeps people thinking they are secure when they really aren't. > > The argument is not security through obscurity. The argument is >that attackers spend more time cracking a package that allows them to >exploit a larger number of hosts. How do you know this? It makes sense to me that they would spend time on what ever system has the weakest security, ie: path of least resistance. I don't know this, so my question applies to me too. # > [snip]
- Re: Big and/or famous sites using qmail? Jenny Holmberg
- Re: Big and/or famous sites using qmail? petervd
- Re: Big and/or famous sites using qmail? S Ashok Kumar
- Re: Big and/or famous sites using qmail? brianb-qmail
- Re: Big and/or famous sites using qmail? Paul Gregg
- Re: Big and/or famous sites using qmail? Keith Warno
- Re: Big and/or famous sites using qmail? Frank Tegtmeyer
- Re: Big and/or famous sites using qmail? Mate Wierdl
- RE: Big and/or famous sites using qmail? Greg Owen
- RE: Big and/or famous sites using qmail? Troy Frericks
- RE: Big and/or famous sites using qmail? Sean Casey
- Re: Big and/or famous sites using qmail? Mate Wierdl
