Pavel Kankovsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >I hate unix. Yeah, it's the *worst* operating system...except for all the others. >> True, but a message written to disk and cycled through N log files >> stands a better chance of being seen than one that never makes it to >> disk. :-) And if the logs are monitored by a log watching process, >> "seeing" them is guaranteed. > >Unless the log is fed to the program directly (via a pipe of something) Like a "!processor" multilog action? >> No, the question is: do you prefer to run out of disk space or keep >> your logs under predetermined limits? > >The size of a log is always kept under a predetermined limit: the >total capacity of a filesystem where the log is located. :) You have each log file in a separate partition? Or do you allow a mail flood to kill ftp logging? -Dave
- A complete log rolling & reporting system? Mark E. Drummond
- RE: A complete log rolling & reporting system? Dave Kitabjian
- RE: A complete log rolling & reporting sys... Dave Sill
- RE: A complete log rolling & reporting... Dave Sill
- RE: A complete log rolling & reporting... Pavel Kankovsky
- RE: A complete log rolling & repor... Russell Nelson
- RE: A complete log rolling & ... Pavel Kankovsky
- RE: A complete log rolling &a... Russell Nelson
- RE: A complete log rolling & repor... Dave Sill
- RE: A complete log rolling & ... Pavel Kankovsky
- Unix as it should be Dave Sill
- Unix as it should be Russell Nelson
- Re: [qmail] Unix as it sh... ari
- Re: [qmail] Unix as it sh... Bruno Wolff III
- Re: Unix as it should be Pavel Kankovsky
- Re: Unix as it should be Chris Garrigues
- Re: Unix as it should be Henri J. Schlereth
- Re: Unix as it should be ... Jon Rust
- Re: Unix as it should be ... Chris Garrigues
- Re: A complete log rolling & reporting sys... Mark E. Drummond
