On Thu, Mar 02, 2000 at 11:34:11AM -0000, Lorens Kockum wrote: > No they do not need to be open relays. If they are qmail > servers that is perfect for the purpose. Why? There is no appreciable gain. To be effective the attacker needs to send a small amount of traffic, which is amplified by a large factor and directed to the victim. Sending a 1K message to qmail with the intention of it bouncing to your victim yields a bounce with your original 1K message plus ~200 bytes of the QSBMF bounce message. If you get a 10K message to bounce, you yield 10K plus ~200 bytes. Those gains are too low to be useful. james -- James Raftery (JBR54) - Programmer Hostmaster - IE TLD Hostmaster IE Domain Registry, University College Dublin Computing Services, Computer Centre, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland. http://www.domainregistry.ie/ Ph: (+353 1) 7062375 Fx: (+353 1) 7062862
- Re: SMTP in distributed DOS Mark Mentovai
- Re: SMTP in distributed DOS Deepak Jain
- Re: SMTP in distributed DOS Michael Shields
- Re: SMTP in distributed DOS Robert Sander
- Re: SMTP in distributed DOS Brian Johnson
- Re: SMTP in distributed DOS Adam McKenna
- Re: SMTP in distributed DOS Steve Sobol
- Re: SMTP in distributed DOS Omachonu Ogali
- Re: SMTP in distributed DOS Vincent Schonau
- Re: SMTP in distributed DOS Lorens Kockum
- Re: SMTP in distributed DOS James Raftery
- Re: SMTP in distributed DOS petervd
- Re: SMTP in distributed DOS Bruno Wolff III
- Re: SMTP in distributed DOS petervd
- Re: SMTP in distributed DOS Bruno Wolff III
- Re: SMTP in distributed DOS James Raftery
- Re: SMTP in distributed DOS petervd
- Re: SMTP in distributed DOS Pavel Kankovsky
- Re: SMTP in distributed DOS Russ Allbery
- Re: SMTP in distributed DOS Dirk Harms-Merbitz
- Re: SMTP in distributed DOS Russ Allbery
