-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 17 Mar 00, at 9:46, Chris Green wrote:
> Well this doesn't seem to agree with what I'm seeing, the incorrectly
> addressed mail was sent to <someone>@enterprises.net, whereas it
> should have been sent to <someone>@enterprise.net and I was definitely
> getting the deferral message.
Is this enough for a reply?
[root@saturnin root]# dig enterprises.net ns
; <<>> DiG 8.2 <<>> enterprises.net ns
;; res options: init recurs defnam dnsrch
;; got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 4
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 5, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 5
;; QUERY SECTION:
;; enterprises.net, type = NS, class = IN
;; ANSWER SECTION:
enterprises.net. 2D IN NS DNS1.BOULEVARDS.COM.
enterprises.net. 2D IN NS NS1.BARRNET.NET.
enterprises.net. 2D IN NS DNSAUTH1.SYS.GTEI.NET.
enterprises.net. 2D IN NS DNSAUTH2.SYS.GTEI.NET.
enterprises.net. 2D IN NS DNSAUTH3.SYS.GTEI.NET.
The domain exists, according to root servers. Of course, it seems
that this delegation is lame: A connection to the first two servers
times out, the three gtei.net servers deny any knowledge about
enterprises.net.
What your nslookup says may be irrelevant, as it doesn't point out
the difference between temporary and permanent failure.
Is that enough?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 6.0.2 -- QDPGP 2.60
Comment: http://community.wow.net/grt/qdpgp.html
iQA/AwUBONH0FVMwP8g7qbw/EQJO1wCg3em2WZ1n3ooXrDVTXLEHcd+J4CoAn2vg
299K/9fXLt56qM02/crZ1QDm
=RVb4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
Petr Novotny, ANTEK CS
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.antek.cz
PGP key ID: 0x3BA9BC3F
-- Don't you know there ain't no devil there's just God when he's drunk.
[Tom Waits]
