Actually I've though of that and it would be easy enough, but the amount
of error handling for failed messages would seem to be the real trick to
calling qmail-remote directly. It would definitely make it fast, but I
think there's enough in qmail that I don't want to reinvent the wheel in a
lot of cases.
I though about using qmqpc somehow to do what I want, but hmm...not sutre
how to really piece it together or plan it logically.
-jeremy
> > I'd like slow mail, deferred or whatever on a host that's dedicated
> > to retrying and not getting new mail.
>
> You may want to try a custom hack. I've heard that some high volume
> sites call qmail-remote directly from the application that generates
> the mail, then hand off messages that get soft failures. Often it's
> enough just to hand them off to normal qmail, but I'd think it'd be
> just as easy to pass them to another host using qmqp, using
> qmail-qmqpc rather than qmail-queue.
>
>
>
>
> --
> John R. Levine, IECC, POB 727, Trumansburg NY 14886 +1 607 387 6869
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], Village Trustee and Sewer Commissioner, http://iecc.com/johnl,
> Member, Provisional board, Coalition Against Unsolicited Commercial E-mail
>
http://www.xxedgexx.com | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------
