On Wed, Apr 05, 2000 at 02:45:18PM +0800, Ismal Hisham Darus wrote:
> Well it just "eaten up" my queues only :-) now occupied 16/23. A bit
> worried only :-).
So you have free slots, then it's a non-issue. Good!
Regards.
>
> anyway thanks for your advise & suggestion..
>
> Date sent: Tue, 4 Apr 2000 23:20:24 -0700
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: Bryan White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Copies to: Chris Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Ismal Hisham Darus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Still problem with yahoo.com
>
> On Tue, Apr 04, 2000 at 10:47:59PM -0400, Bryan White wrote:
> >
> >
> > > On Wed, Apr 05, 2000 at 09:50:05AM +0800, Ismal Hisham Darus wrote:
> > > > My site still have porbelm connecting with yahoo.com .. everytime i got
> > the
> > > > message : Connected_to_128.11.23.225_but_connection_died. I even send
> > an
> > > > email to aol.com and successfully sent the email. Does yahoo.com needs
> > > > another patch ? please help ..
> > >
> > > Neither of yahoo.com's mail exchangers is answering right now. It's not
> > your
> > > problem. Don't worry about it.
> >
> > Any idea how long till they will be back up? Is there someplace to find
> > this information. I have been struggling with mails queues clogged with
> > messages for yahoo.com all day. I am on the virge of rejecting new messages
> > to the yahoo domain.
>
> In what way are you "struggling"? Sure there may be plenty of emails in your queue,
> but is it really hurting? Or do you just not like that idea of qmail-remote failing
> and seeing the corresponding log entry? Remote delivery is very cheap with qmail so
> you don't need to be too concerned unless the yahoo mail is consuming all of your
> concurrencyremote. If it's not, then you can sleep soundly as it's no big deal.
>
>
> Regards.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Ismal Hisham Mohd Darus
> Asst. Manager, System Support
> John Hancock Life Insurance (Malaysia) Berhad
>
>
>
>
