On Sun, Apr 09, 2000 at 01:40:33AM +0200, Andrzej Kukula wrote:
>
> Here are my own mini-survey on (E)SMTP servers and their buggy-RFC-1869
> behavior:
[very interesting stuff deleted]
> +-----------------------------------------------+-----------------+
> | (E)SMTP server software name | RFC 1869 bug? |
> +-----------------------------------------------+-----------------+
> | qmail 1.03 | no |
> | ZMailer 2.99.52-patch1 | no |
> | Exim 2.12 | no |
> | MS SMTP Mail 5.5.* | no |
> | MailShield SMTPCisco SMTP Gateway | no |
> | America Online mail version 71.10 | no |
> | HotMail ESMTP server | no |
> | Lotus Domino 5.0.2a ESMTP Service | no |
> +-----------------------------------------------+-----------------+
> | sendmail 8.8.8, 8.9.1, 8.9.3 | YES |
> | Postfix up to snapshot 20000309 | YES |
> | Mercury 1.44 | YES |
> | Rayan S. Zachariassen ESMTP Server (mail.net) | YES |
> +-----------------------------------------------+-----------------+
> | CheckPoint FireWall-1 Secure SMTP Server | plain SMTP only |
> | MudMail 1.71 | plain SMTP only |
> | GroupWise Internet Agent 5.5.3.1 | plain SMTP only |
> +-----------------------------------------------+-----------------+
FYI: "InterMail vM.4.01.02.17" also allows multiple HELOs/EHLOs, i.e.
"no" to "RFC 1869 bug".
/magnus
