Re: temporary failure warning message

[Dave Sill]

>At 4/24/2000 10:56 AM -0400, Dave Sill wrote or quoted:
>>"J.M. Roth \(iip\)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> >One of our users had an important mail in the queue which was returned to
>> >him only 7 days later ('cause of a DNS failure), way too late...
>>
>>Oh? What would the user have done had he known there was a DNS
>>failure?
>
>He might have tried to fax, fed-ex, or otherwise send the information via 
>another medium.

Anyone who assumes that An Important Mail has been delivered intact
and read by the recipient simply because they didn't receive a warning 
or bounce message deserves what they get.

-Dave