>Steve Wolfe writes: > > The problem isn't MUA's. The problem is that users were duped into > > executing a program of a malicious intent. > >And until the MUA is fixed, this will happen again, and again and >again and again. Replace your MUA with something that's secure and >you have solved the problem. Stop the email at the MTA and you're a >sitting duck for the next invocation. Lather, rinse, repeat. a lot of people forget that when you get a defective car, you don't sue the dealer; you sue the vendor. for some reason, people also think it's somehow different with the windows. cheers to those of you that have enough whiskey in your system to where that makes the slightest bit of sense. :)
- Re: Future of qmail: will it care about viri/worms/etc? markd
- Re: Future of qmail: will it care about viri/worms/etc? Patrick Berry
- Re: Future of qmail: will it care about viri/worms/etc? David L. Nicol
- Re: Future of qmail: will it care about viri/worms... Kevin Waterson
- Re: Future of qmail: will it care about viri/worms... Steve Wolfe
- Re: Future of qmail: will it care about viri/w... Russell Nelson
- Re: Future of qmail: will it care about vi... Mrs. Brisby
- Re: Future of qmail: will it care about vi... Alex Shipp
- Re: Future of qmail: will it care about viri/w... Bruno Wolff III
- Re: Future of qmail: will it care about vi... Steve Wolfe
- Re: Future of qmail: will it care about viri/w... Bruno Wolff III
- Re: Future of qmail: will it care about vi... Steve Wolfe
- RE: Future of qmail: will it care about vi... John W. Lemons III
