And his ISP won't. :) Especially since I was a dial-up user when the
whole "block the dial-ups" discussion started and was adamant that it was
a mistake. :) If one of our users SPAMs, regardless of how, and we are
notified, they lose their account. It's that simple and it is very
effective, I can assure you. :)
Tim Mayo
On Sun, 7 May 2000, Russell Nelson wrote:
> John White writes:
> > On Sat, May 06, 2000 at 04:30:54PM -0400, Len Budney wrote:
> > > (BTW blocking DUL has not interfered with my own email in a couple of
> > > years now. So despite the big talk of folks who use it, I continue to
> > > send mail directly from my machine. DUL blocking only works because it
> > > is a rarely-taken measure.)
> >
> > Amazing. In one year, our office ran across:
> >
> > aol.com
>
> Add to that list crynwr. Len, you've sent me mail directly; no
> problem. Yet I block on the DUL. I think the reason you haven't had
> any problems is because your ISP hasn't listed its dialups with the
> DUL. In general, the DUL doesn't go looking. It lists modems for
> ISPs that contribute, or those with a spamming problem.
>
> --
> -russ nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://russnelson.com
> Crynwr sells support for free software | PGPok | "Ask not what your country
> 521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315 268 1925 voice | can force other people to
> Potsdam, NY 13676-3213 | +1 315 268 9201 FAX | do for you..." -Perry M.
>
---------------------------------
Timothy L. Mayo mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior Systems Administrator
localconnect(sm)
http://www.localconnect.net/
The National Business Network Inc. http://www.nb.net/
One Monroeville Center, Suite 850
Monroeville, PA 15146
(412) 810-8888 Phone
(412) 810-8886 Fax
