On Mon, May 15, 2000 at 05:41:49PM -0500, David L. Nicol wrote: [snip] > > Depending on the various costs (WAN bandwitdh, CPU, storage space, > programmer time) this architecture could result in something similar > to usenet, with each extended queue storage server contacting the > others at regular intervals with a list of message-IDs it has received, > so that all of them get multiple chances to receive the same message > stuck in the queue. Do note that usenet was never designed to guarantee message delivery. Usenet was designed for non-reliable wide-scale messaging. These useless and irrelevant facts were brought to you by LackOfCaffeine2000(tm). Greetz, Peter. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Peter van Dijk [student:developer:madly in love]
- Share queue between servers and other questions. Michael Boman
- Re: Share queue between servers and other questions. John White
- RE: Share queue between servers and other questions. Greg Owen
- Re: Share queue between servers and other questi... Michael Boman
- Re: Share queue between servers and other qu... richard
- Re: Share queue between servers and other qu... John White
- Re: Share queue between servers and othe... Michael Boman
- distributed redundnat queue archite... David L. Nicol
- Re: distributed redundnat queue... Peter van Dijk
- Re: distributed redundnat q... David L. Nicol
- Re: Share queue between servers and... John White
- RE: Share queue between servers and other questions. Greg Owen
- Re: Share queue between servers and other questi... Jeroen ten Berge
