Re: Pummelling limiting, again

[James R Grinter]

John R Levine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> causing thrashing and other disasters.  So their solution is to let you set a
> limit on the number of simultaneous connections from a single host and reject
> mail (not connections) if there are more than that.  Surely it is a

Reject rather than defer? I predict lots more complaints from users,
than they probably make already about their mail delivery being slow,
if they do that. Mad.

James.