Dave,
You do not need to improve anything! LWQ and your deamenor on this list is
outstanding. I was an extreme qmail newbie. I had know idea how to do
anything!! After reading all of the necissary information, I was still
confused. Then I found LWQ(Thanks to this list). Just by using LWQ I had a
test server running in 2 weeks. After my test server was complete, I made
the transition to a production server. I accomplished this in 2 hours.
When I did have problems, usually related to being a newbie, You and 99% of
the people on this list gave me the neccissary information or at least a
nudge in the right direction. If this indivdual does not like the "quality
of support" that is being received from the qmail community then the only
thing that I can suggest is that he switch to sendmail and buy a book!
Steve P.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dave Sill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2000 8:39 AM
Subject: RE: Purpose of this list
> Brad Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >However, qmail does suffer from the same issue as BSD traditionally
> >has, which is that everyone involved is too damned smart, so they
> >write in terse, dense and frighteningly useful language and get
> >annoyed when people have difficulty parsing the information.
>
> I worked hard to make "Life with qmail" newbie-friendly, and I try
> hard to be newbie-friendly on this list. If you have specific
> constructive suggestions on how I can improve either, please let me
> know.
>
> >The other section that doesn't exist (or does it? It's not easy to
> >find) is "Qmail for users" which would talk about qmail just from the
> >perspective of the *nix user, with the userland commands, without
> >mixing it all in with the admin info.
>
> See:
>
> http://Web.InfoAve.Net/~dsill/lwq.html#usage
>
> -Dave
>
