On Thu, May 25, 2000 at 11:44:29AM +0100, Alex Shipp wrote: > >If that's what happening with your MUA, then it's just that your MUA is > >falling for the hoax. > > > >I trust a more MIME-compliant mailreader. > > Is this a MIME issue? If so, can anyone point me to the RFC describing > how to handle UUENCODE embedded within a MIME message. No it's not. It's more of someone complaining about normal mail text content misinterpreted as it was something different. (As I also illustrated, wagely with my eudora-bug-reference in my .sig :-) The signature is and has never been uuencoded, and should therefore not be interpreted as such. I can show examples of how webbrowser implementations also show this form of self-applied decision making, but not in this forum. /magnus
