Clifford Thurber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Could anyone give me some feedback on what the pros and cons of using
>cyclog or multilog vs. splogger. I have just installed multilog and at
>first glance it appears a little odd but maybe I am just not that familiar
>with it yet. Thanks in advance.
splogger uses syslog, and syslog/syslogd have several security,
performance, and reliability concerns. Syslogd can consume vast
amounts of CPU, is an unsecured network service, will log until the
log partition is full, and can simply drop log messages if it's too
busy.
-Dave
