on 6/28/00 9:17 PM, Vincent Danen at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I've looked at the web pages for both tools and in the archives
> themselves, but I can't find anything having to do with licensing
> issues for these two programs. I know they're not GNU, but I was
> wondering about distribution for them.
>
> I've made Mandrake RPMs for them would like to know if I can
> distribute them. The only changes I've made are to place the
> binaries in /usr/bin instead of /usr/local/bin. Can I distribute
> binaries this way? No patches or anything else have been applied to
> them. Or do I have to put them into /usr/local/bin in order to
> distribute them?
>
> Thank you in advance. If you can point me to a page describing the
> license for either program as well, I would sincerely appreciate it
> (as I think the license should be included in the RPMs also).
A quick peek on the list archive came up with no definative answer. The
only page that might help you out is:
ftp://koobera.math.uic.edu/www/lists.html#qmaildist which tells you how to
subscribe to a list which is for distributors of qmail-related packages.
I'd have to assume that ucspi-tcp and daemontools are somewhat qmail
related.
Pat
