Irwan Hadi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> http://www.kyoto.wide.ad.jp/mta/eval1/eindex.html > >I saw, at least at evaluation 3, postfix beat qmail ;) Check again. qmail won all three tests. In Evaluation 3, qmail finished in ~125 seconds, and Postfix took over 150 seconds--next to last place. So where's that 3x speed Postfix has over qmail? -Dave
- Re: Mailing list performance David Dyer-Bennet
- Re: Mailing list performance Dave Sill
- Re: Mailing list performance Irwan Hadi
- Re: Mailing list performance P.Y. Adi Prasaja
- Re: Mailing list performance Dave Sill
- Re: Mailing list performance P.Y. Adi Prasaja
- Re: Mailing list performance Dave Sill
- Re: Mailing list performance P.Y. Adi Prasaja
- Re: Mailing list performance Dave Sill
- Re: Mailing list performance P.Y. Adi Prasaja
- Re: why qmail is more secure, was: Mailing lis... Dave Sill
- Re: why qmail is more secure, was: Mailing list perform... Ronny Haryanto
- Re: why qmail is more secure, was: Mailing list pe... Dave Sill
- Re: why qmail is more secure, was: Mailing lis... Ronny Haryanto
- Re: why qmail is more secure, was: Mailing... Michael T. Babcock
- Re: why qmail is more secure, was: Mailing list pe... David Dyer-Bennet