The user only had five email addresses to add, no where near the 75
processes I've had running.

Should tcprules be running once per instance? 

Is a mysqld process spawned for each user authentication?

That sounds a bit extreme if not absurd.  I could understand if a client
was being invoked, but not a daemon process for each request. 

I'm somehow back down to just one tcprules process with what appears to be
a single associated mysqld process (they're a single pid apart)

-jeff

On Thu, 17 Aug 2000, Tim Hunter wrote:

> I might be wrong since I do not use mysql, but my guess would be that the
> new domain admin is adding users, apparently too fast for your machine to
> process.
> 
> Each time a new user is added it attempts to recompile the vpasswd file to
> cdb; correct?
> 
> Check what the tcprules process it doing, it should tell you.
> 
> -- Tim
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jeff Garvas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2000 10:16 AM
> Subject: looping tcprules ?
> 
> 
> >
> > Hi everyone.  I have a strange occurance with my first qmail server ever
> > installed, so I appologize if this is a stupid question.
> >
> > Up until today I was running eight different domains off the system
> > flawlessly.  This morning I added a ninth customer and sent them off on
> > their way to the website interface.
> >
> > About 15 minutes ago the machine had a load of 48+ and everything came to
> > a crawl.  It appears I had about 75+ instances of tcprules running and a
> > mysqld for each tcprules process.
> >
> > Being new to qmail I'm a bit confused as to what to do next.  This has
> > basically brought my machine to a halt.  I stopped qmail, killed all the
> > tcprules processes and restart it.  The machine instantly became fast, but
> > it seems to have gone right back into that loop.
> >
> > Is there something simple I'm missing?  Incidentally I am utilzing mysql
> > based authentication.  If I missed something in a FAQ or Document just
> > point me there.  I'm really thrown off because this system has been stable
> > for well over a month and this is the first "issue".
> >
> > -jeff
> >
> >
> >
> 

Reply via email to