> Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Received: (qmail 8713 invoked from network); 30 Aug 2000 03:20:52 -0000
> Received: from muncher.math.uic.edu (131.193.178.181)by 192.dsl7839.rcsis.com with
>SMTP; 30 Aug 2000 03:20:52 -0000
> Received: (qmail 31869 invoked by uid 1002); 30 Aug 2000 03:19:49 -0000
> Mailing-List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm
> Precedence: bulk
> Delivered-To: mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Received: (qmail 24239 invoked from network); 30 Aug 2000 03:19:48 -0000
> Received: from dsl-cap-209-115-249-138-cgy.nucleus.com (HELO
>dsl-ch-l15-c80-n249-i138-cgy.nucleus.com) (209.115.249.138)by muncher.math.uic.edu
>with SMTP; 30 Aug 2000 03:19:48 -0000
> Received: (qmail 19854 invoked from network); 29 Aug 2000 21:19:18 -0600
> Received: from dsl-cap-209-115-249-136-cgy.nucleus.com (HELO vodacomm.ca)
>([EMAIL PROTECTED])by dsl-cap-209-115-249-138-cgy.nucleus.com with SMTP; 29 Aug
>2000 21:19:18 -0600
> Sender: sfbosch
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2000 21:14:15 -0600
> From: "Stephen F. Bosch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.16 i586)
> X-Accept-Language: en
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> CC: Qmail Mailing List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Timezone
> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> X-Mozilla-Status: 8011
> X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000
> X-UIDL: 967605652.8716.dream
>
> Eric Cox wrote:
> >
> > "Stephen F. Bosch" wrote:
> > >
> > > Daniel Augusto Fernandes wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Yes, I agree with the MUA being responsible for doing the translation.
> > > > But some doesn't do that.
> > >
> > > Like Mickeysoft's Outlook Excess, for example. Outlook is not standards
> > > compliant.
> > > What you're essentially asking for a way to break qmail so that it will
> > > work with Microsoft's mediocre product. =)
> >
> > Actually neither Netscape 4.72 nor Pine 4.10 do it either.
>
> Then why does my version of 4.72 do it correctly?
Are you sure? I've quoted the all the headers above to show you my
Netscape clearly does not do it. Here are some dates from other messages,
all in Netscape:
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2000 22:34:04 GMT
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2000 22:51:22 +0200
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2000 18:04:11 -0400 (EDT)
If Netscape is translating them, should they not all be a common timezone?
Eric
