Hi,
I have problems when delivering some kind of messages;
by command line, i can deliver JUST FROM ROOT and JUST REMOTE messages:
this work:
# echo to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]|/var/qmail/bin/qmail-inject
# tail -f /var/log/qmail/current | tai64nlocal
2000-09-02 03:57:16.713748500 new msg 48075
2000-09-02 03:57:16.713757500 info msg 48075: bytes 194 from
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> qp 12231 uid 0
2000-09-02 03:57:16.717471500 starting delivery 8: msg 48075 to remote
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
2000-09-02 03:57:16.717476500 status: local 0/10 remote 1/20
2000-09-02 03:57:46.962870500 delivery 8: success:
212.110.6.34_accepted_message./Remote_host_said:_250_DAA11694_Message_accepted_for_delivery/
2000-09-02 03:57:46.962883500 status: local 0/10 remote 0/20
2000-09-02 03:57:46.962886500 end msg 48075
all the other "kind" of messages fault,
for example:
from root to root ( I have a correct alias for root in .qmail-root ):
# echo to: root |/var/qmail/bin/qmail-inject
# tail -f /var/log/qmail/current |tai64nlocal
2000-09-02 04:00:48.849831500 new msg 48075
2000-09-02 04:00:48.849953500 info msg 48075: bytes 197 from
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> qp 12251 uid 0
2000-09-02 04:00:48.853694500 starting delivery 9: msg 48075 to local
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
2000-09-02 04:00:48.853699500 status: local 1/10 remote 0/20
2000-09-02 04:00:48.859922500 delivery 9: deferral:
Unable_to_forward_message:_unable_to_exec_qq_(#4.3.0)./
2000-09-02 04:00:48.859932500 status: local 0/10 remote 0/20
from a ID !=0 to remote:
# su fp
$ echo to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |/var/qmail/bin/qmail-inject
qmail-inject: fatal: unable to exec qq (#4.3.0)
from a ID !=0 to local:
$echo to: root|/var/qmail/bin/qmail-inject
qmail-inject: fatal: unable to exec qq (#4.3.0)
I looked all RFCs and documentation but i'm not able to find out a
solution .... i set up another machine
with the same qmail installation [from the tarball] and the same Debian
gnu linux and the second server
works fine [!]
I tried to find out when the mail process stops looking in the big
pictures ...
$ date
Sat Sep 2 04:17:39 CEST 2000
$ echo to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] |/var/qmail/bin/qmail-inject
$ su
# cd /var/qmail/bin
# ls -f -lu qmail-inject qmail-queue qmail-send qmail-lspawn
qmail-local
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root qmail 35252 Sep 2 04:17 qmail-inject
for example:
from root to root ( I have a correct alias for root in .qmail-root ):
# echo to: root |/var/qmail/bin/qmail-inject
# tail -f /var/log/qmail/current |tai64nlocal
2000-09-02 04:00:48.849831500 new msg 48075
2000-09-02 04:00:48.849953500 info msg 48075: bytes 197 from
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> qp 12251 uid 0
2000-09-02 04:00:48.853694500 starting delivery 9: msg 48075 to local
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
2000-09-02 04:00:48.853699500 status: local 1/10 remote 0/20
2000-09-02 04:00:48.859922500 delivery 9: deferral:
Unable_to_forward_message:_unable_to_exec_qq_(#4.3.0)./
2000-09-02 04:00:48.859932500 status: local 0/10 remote 0/20
from a ID !=0 to remote:
# su fp
$ echo to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |/var/qmail/bin/qmail-inject
qmail-inject: fatal: unable to exec qq (#4.3.0)
from a ID !=0 to local:
$echo to: root|/var/qmail/bin/qmail-inject
qmail-inject: fatal: unable to exec qq (#4.3.0)
I looked all RFCs and documentation but i'm not able to find out a
solution .... i set up another machine
with the same qmail installation [from the tarball] and the same Debian
gnu linux and the second server
works fine [!]
I tried to find out when the mail process stops looking in the big
pictures ...
$ date
Sat Sep 2 04:17:39 CEST 2000
$ echo to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] |/var/qmail/bin/qmail-inject
$ su
# cd /var/qmail/bin
# ls -f -lu qmail-inject qmail-queue qmail-send qmail-lspawn
qmail-local
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root qmail 35252 Sep 2 04:17 qmail-inject
-rws--x--x 1 qmailq qmail 12908 Sep 2 04:07 qmail-queue
-rwx--x--x 1 root qmail 40748 Sep 2 03:27 qmail-send
-rwx------ 1 root qmail 17532 Sep 2 03:27 qmail-lspawn
-rwx--x--x 1 root qmail 34396 Sep 2 04:15 qmail-local
I also have obviously problems with web server's cgi [php] when mailing
web users...
Can anyone help me?
Does exist some verbose archive of qmail errors [not rfcs] and
troubleshooting?
Thanks in advance,
bye
Fabio Pedrazzoli
