Quoted from Robin S. Socha:
> It's "Was: <old subject>". "Was: Re:" does not make sense.

Hmpf, I'll bear that in mind. I'm a very ``learn-by-example'' type,
and most people I know took the simple way out:

)^Anew subject (was 

(This was in a place where mutt users were a majority---or at least
the most vocal on-list. :-))

[Re: Gnus]
> Naahhh... It's just that it cures *many* problems I've had with mailing
> lists before.

Does it intelligently remove excessive quoting? ;-) (There was one time
when someone posted a message with a 2800% quoted-to-original ratio...)

>               Cc: me to your heart's content - I ain't gonna be seeing
> no stinkin' dupes, d00d3...

I used to do the DJB thing and bounce duplicates. Then I realised that
it happened so often, that I'd rather save the bandwidth on my server.
It now just discards duplicates.

>                             It's also one of the few MUAs with generic
> support for Maildir (mutt being the obvious alternative).

Yes, Maildir rocks. I even wrote a one-line script that will tell me
how many new messages there are in each Maildir folder.

[snip of some very nice features of Gnus, 2 (out of 3) of which mutt
doesn't seem to implement]

Now, there's something mutt implements that Gnus (the one included
with GNU emacs 20.7) doesn't: Mail-Followup-To and Mail-Reply-To.

Mail-Followup-To is used to discourage duplicate copies, obviously.
Mail-Reply-To is used to give people a ``real'' address to reply to,
for dumb mailing lists that require subscription before posting.

> >> "nuking Redmond will increase the world's productivity by 900%".
> > After that, you still have AOLers to deal with...
> 
> You should consider buying large amounts of cattle-prod shares.

If only I can LART them over the wire... after all, the lusers aren't
invading my home, they're invading my Maildir.

        ---Chris K.
-- 
 Chris, the Young One |_ but what's a dropped message between friends? 
  Auckland, New Zealand |_ this is UDP, not TCP after all ;) ---John H. 
http://cloud9.hedgee.com/ |_ Robinson, IV  

Reply via email to