-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 11 Sep 2000, at 12:03, Scott D. Yelich wrote:
> > Pointing to CNAMEs is close to forbidden.
>
> ok, I can't resist:
>
> "WHY" ?
1. Because the law (RFC) says so.
2. You also want some logic? Because you'd have to start over
again resolving the CNAME chain. There were fears of efficiency.
I still don't understand why #1 is not enough for you. Are you in
position to change the RFCs? If yes, please do. If not, well...
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 6.5.8 -- QDPGP 2.61b
Comment: http://community.wow.net/grt/qdpgp.html
iQA/AwUBOb4Q/lMwP8g7qbw/EQIItQCguo1XUFwxxQzb8pfbJpg2YeDrvdIAoMUV
VYuhEbESx/1BuegJhKoQxZsR
=bvfk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
Petr Novotny, ANTEK CS
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.antek.cz
PGP key ID: 0x3BA9BC3F
-- Don't you know there ain't no devil there's just God when he's drunk.
[Tom Waits]
