Yes. This answer is _very_ late.
On Sat, Feb 12, 2000 at 02:20:13AM -0800, Aaron Nabil wrote:
>
> Thanks for the "qmail-remote outgoingip patch", I was able to
Who contributed this, and where?
Has anything been done to this further? Making it possible to bind
qmail-remote to a specific interface.
/magnus
(including rest of letter, as it was a couple of months ago ;-)
> successfully apply it (by hand) to qmail 1.03. Unfortunatly, it
> didn't fix the problem I was having, which was that qmail was
> connecting to itself (it was the backup MX for a down system) because the
> MX record was bound to a secondary IP address, thus looping mail. The
> reason is because ipme still just looks at the primary interface and
> qmail-remote uses that to compare against the MX record instead of the
> bound address.
>
> Here is a very lightly (oh, about 5 minutes) tested patch. I was kinda in
> a hurry and am not quite sure if [0] of a ip_address is the most or least
> significant octet, I was betting on it being the most but this should
> still work even if it's the least, as I don't think zero is legal for
> either.
>
> *** ../qmail-ldap/qmail-remote.c Tue Jan 11 01:43:02 2000
> --- qmail-remote.c Sat Feb 12 01:47:31 2000
> ***************
> *** 29,34 ****
> --- 29,35 ----
> #include "timeoutconn.h"
> #include "timeoutread.h"
> #include "timeoutwrite.h"
> + #include "byte.h"
>
> #define HUGESMTPTEXT 5000
>
> ***************
> *** 396,402 ****
>
> prefme = 100000;
> for (i = 0;i < ip.len;++i)
> ! if (ipme_is(&ip.ix[i].ip))
> if (ip.ix[i].pref < prefme)
> prefme = ip.ix[i].pref;
>
> --- 407,413 ----
>
> prefme = 100000;
> for (i = 0;i < ip.len;++i)
> ! if (outip.d[0] ? byte_equal(&ip.ix[i].ip,4,&outip.d[0]) :
>ipme_is(&ip.ix[i].ip))
> if (ip.ix[i].pref < prefme)
> prefme = ip.ix[i].pref;
>
> --
> Aaron Nabil
>
