Thus said Ronny Haryanto on Sat, 07 Oct 2000 16:36:34 CDT: > Mutt understands "Mail-Followup-To:" (MFT) and can be set to honor > that header. If you tell Mutt that you are subscribed to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] then it will generate the appropriate MFT header > (see mine). Later on if another Mutt user replies to my message, the > reply will only be sent to the qmail list by default, provided he/she > enables the honor-mft option. Mutt is not the only MUA that understands this either. I wonder how many MUA actually do honor this header? I know NMH and possibly MH can handle this---and consequently, so does EXMH which is what I use. For those of you that may be wondering what this header is all about see: http://cr.yp.to/proto/replyto.html Andy -- [-----------[system uptime]--------------------------------------------] 3:46pm up 19:13, 4 users, load average: 1.15, 1.40, 1.38
- Re: qmail list reply-to Jason Brooke
- Re: qmail list reply-to Brett Randall
- Re: qmail list reply-to Jason Brooke
- Re: qmail list reply-to Brett Randall
- Re: qmail list reply-to Charles McLagan
- Re: qmail list reply-to Vince Vielhaber
- Re: qmail list reply-to Robin S. Socha
- Re: qmail list reply-to Vince Vielhaber
- Re: qmail list reply-to Russell Nelson
- Re: qmail list reply-to Ronny Haryanto
- Re: qmail list reply-to Andy Bradford
- Re: qmail list reply-to Raul Miller
- Re: qmail list reply-to Adam McKenna
- OT: a "real" MUA for X? (was qmail list reply-to... Mike Glover
- Re: OT: a "real" MUA for X? (was qmail list repl... Brett Randall
- Re: OT: a "real" MUA for X? (was qmail list repl... Dave Sill
- Re: OT: a "real" MUA for X? (was qmail list repl... Vince Vielhaber
- Re: OT: a "real" MUA for X? (was qmail list repl... Brett Randall
- Re: OT: a "real" MUA for X? (was qmail list repl... David L. Nicol
- Re: OT: a "real" MUA for X? (was qmail list repl... Dave Sill
- Re: OT: a "real" MUA for X? (was qmail list repl... Robin S. Socha
