Russell Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Nahhhh. There's already a tai64nunix as well as tai64nfrac. While I
> think Dan's just a *tad* early, I don't think we should be introducing
> Y2.038K bugs into code that's already been fixed. I mean, I'm 42 now.
> I'll only be 80 then. I expect I'll still be programming, and I don't
> want to be in the position of today's coding veterans, who had to
> admit that they let Y2K bugs slip through their fingers.
Like I wrote in the announcement and stated on the web page, the better
approach would be to fix qmailanalog, but I'm not going to do that and
it looks like Dan isn't either, the latest qmailananlog I can find is
0.70 beta dated 1998-08-30.
--
Matthias Andree
