Big Brother tells me that Brett Randall wrote:
> >>>>> "Martin" == Martin Jespersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
> A better alternative, IMHO, is to use a certain anti-spam e-mail
> address (someone on this list uses it but I can't remember who) that

     That would be I.  For mailing lists, it is even better:

1. [EMAIL PROTECTED] bounces emails sent to it with a message indicating
that the address has expired.  The return address of this message has an
encrypted timestamp, such as:

     [EMAIL PROTECTED]

2. Encrypted addresses such as above have their timestamp verified as recent.
Old messages are bounced exactly as in #1.

     These two steps prevent 'cold call' emails.  Your email to me must be
a response to an email from me.  Very soon, I will have this patched so that
emails with a valid signature from a key on my ring are always accepted.
Also, I allow certain addresses in under certain criteria.

    For mailing lists, I do the following:

3. I subscribe to each list as a different address, such as the one for this
list, [EMAIL PROTECTED]

4. Email coming to [EMAIL PROTECTED] has its headers checked to see if
it was processed by the appropriate list server.

5a. Mail passing #4 is put into my qmail folder (I have over 200 hundred
folders).  I have a shell script for reading each of these folders (or
specifed ones), which set MAILUSER and MAILHOST.

5b. Mail not passing #4 is redirected to [EMAIL PROTECTED]; see step #1.

    So far, I have not seen any spam to my qmail address 8-).

--
"Restore your inalienable human rights.       Jack McKinney
 Vote Libertarian.  http://www.lp.org         http://www.lorentz.com
 http://www.harrybrowne2000.org               [EMAIL PROTECTED]
                                              1024D/D68F2C07 4096g/38AEF076

PGP signature

Reply via email to