I hardly read the list nowdays due to the noise. I agree - there's a need for a fork. -- J�rgen On Tue, Oct 31, 2000 at 07:37:13AM +0100, Magnus Bodin wrote: > On Sun, Oct 29, 2000 at 02:08:14AM +0200, Felix von Leitner wrote: > > PS: If anyone is interested in a mailing list about technical qmail > > issues, please tell me. I am considering starting a qmail mailing list > > where Outlook users can subscribe in the first place and were emails > > from people who can't quote are rejected. Then we could stop wasting > > time with whining lusers who couldn't even install qmail themselves if > > their life depended on it and discuss some issues. > > > There is definitively a need for a mailinglist fork to qmail-users and > qmail-developers. > > > /magnus > > -- > http://x42.com/ > >
- RE: people are definately starting to harvest emailadr... Alexander Jernejcic
- Re: people are definately starting to harvest ema... James T. Perry
- Re: people are definately starting to harvest... Alex Pennace
- Re: people are definately starting to harvest... Stephen Bosch
- RE: people are definately starting to har... Jeroen ten Berge
- Re: people are definately starting to... Brett Randall
- RE: people are definately starting to harvest emailadr... Austad, Jay
- Re: people are definately starting to harvest ema... Felix von Leitner
- Re: people are definately starting to harvest... Ask Bjoern Hansen
- qmail-list fork? (was: [sic] people are defin... Magnus Bodin
- Re: qmail-list fork? (was: [sic] people a... J�rgen Persson
- Re: qmail-list fork? (was: [sic] peop... Johan Almqvist
- Re: people are definately starting to harvest ema... Robin S. Socha
- Re: people are definately starting to harvest... Jason Brooke
- Re: people are definately starting to har... Brett Randall
