On Sun, Nov 19, 2000 at 03:46:59PM +0000, Jose AP Celestino wrote:
>
> And the problem persists? Isn't /usr/lib/libresolv.so a broken symlink? Check it
> out please.
>
Assuming I'm following the links correctly:
benfell:/usr/local/src # ls -al /usr/lib/libresolv.so /lib/libresolv.so.2
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 162474 Jul 30 12:42 /lib/libresolv.so.2
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 24 Nov 14 10:45 /usr/lib/libresolv.so ->
../../lib/libresolv.so.2
benfell:/usr/local/src # file /usr/lib/libresolv.so
/usr/lib/libresolv.so: symbolic link to ../../lib/libresolv.so.2
benfell:/usr/local/src # file /lib/libresolv.so.2
/lib/libresolv.so.2: ELF 32-bit LSB shared object, Intel 80386, version 1, not stripped
I think something's there, even if it's broken. Though I haven't had
trouble building anything else.
> David Benfell wrote:
>
> > Thanks Jose, but...
> >
> > On Sat, Nov 18, 2000 at 09:40:42PM +0000, Jose AP Celestino wrote:
> > >
> > > The make process fails to find the named (literally) functions. The functions
> > > raising the errors are located at the
> > >
> > > libresolv
> > >
> > > libs. At my system: /usr/lib/libresolv.so -> /lib/libresolv.so.2 ->
> > > /lib/libresolv-2.1.92.so.
> > >
> > I upgraded glibc on my system, so I've now got (full directory
> > attached) libresolv files in /lib, /usr/lib, and /usr/local/lib.
> >
> > > Hmmm, have you installed the glibc? Of course you have. So where are the
> > > libresolv* ?
> > >
> > Oh yeah. At least twice.
> >
> > > Find them hand cp ou ln them to their right locations (/lib and /usr/lib).
> > >
> > Versions are already there...
> >
> > > Do that and qmail will compile ok (or at least will not fail in this same
> > > place).
--
David Benfell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
The grand leap of the whale up the Fall of Niagara is esteemed, by all
who have seen it, as one of the finest spectacles in nature.
-- Benjamin Franklin.
[from fortune]
PGP signature
