* David Dyer-Bennet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001121 18:24]:
> Peter Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes on 21 November 2000 at 13:38:58 -0500
> > BTW, just to curtail any objections, if your mailer cannot reply *just* to
> > the list without Cc:'ing the other original recipients (like I've done
> > here), get a new mailer. Yours is broken.
> Are there any? I've certainly never encountered one; I have simply
> formed the habit of manually editing out the direct address.
mutt. I hit ``L'' to reply to the list only. (Newly added bonus feature:
ignore_list_reply_to. Ignores the Reply-To: header if it was set to point
back to the list. :)
So that means:
r -- reply to Reply-To: or, if lacking, From:
g -- reply to all original recipients
L -- reply only to the list, if one is found in From: or Cc:
/pg
--
Peter Green : Gospel Communications Network, SysAdmin : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
> I'm an idiot.. At least this [bug] took about 5 minutes to find..
We need to find some new terms to describe the rest of us mere mortals
then.
(Craig Schlenter in response to Linus Torvalds's mailing about a kernel bug.)
