On Tue, 28 Nov 2000, eric yu wrote:
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Samuel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2000 11:28:55 -0500 (EST)
> To: eric yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: HELP!!
>
>
[ copy of my original reply deleted ]
Please don't copy irrelevant information in your reply.
Please use a mail reader that wraps lines at less than 80 characters
(otherwise it's very hard to read your replies).
Also, please reply to the list too - that way you'll have lots more
people to examine your problem and hence a better chance of seeing a
solution.
> > What do the logs say (TM)?
>
> Problem_getting_user_maildrop_****@machine_name.com
Please don't sanitise your logs. We need to see the timestamps and
other information from qmail-send; eg here's a complete message log:
975372810.674940 new msg 98664
975372810.675125 info msg 98664: bytes 2881 from
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> qp 17474 uid 401
975372810.676295 starting delivery 35860: msg 98664 to local
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
975372810.676317 status: local 1/10 remote 0/20
975372810.683113 delivery 35860: success: did_1+0+0/
975372810.683232 status: local 0/10 remote 0/20
975372810.683342 end msg 98664
>
> The strange thing is that the original mail should be sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
>was sent successfully.
>
> But qmail has sent an additional ****@machine_name.com, which I dont have this
>****'s mailbox. Do you know why qmail sent the original message to
>****@machine_name.com?? or is the sender a spammer??
What is your default delivery mechanism (ie what are the arguments
after qmail-start in your startup script?
Does this user have a .qmail file, and if so what does it look like.
--
Regards
Peter
----------
Peter Samuel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.e-smith.org (development) http://www.e-smith.com (corporate)
Phone: +1 613 368 4398 Fax: +1 613 564 7739
e-smith, inc. 1500-150 Metcalfe St, Ottawa, ON K2P 1P1 Canada
"If you kill all your unhappy customers, you'll only have happy ones left"
