* Greg Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>* Some other luser:
>> How exactly is my MUA broken?
> It isn't, the user is broken.
Indeed. Tell me, Jamin, does your inflatable sheep talk? If so, do you
wait for it to ask you for a fag, then repeat everything it said during
intercourse (including the funny noises your mother and the new neighbour
were making as well as the TV) and then ask if you were /really/ good?
More to the point: why do you not repeat everything that /your/ sheep said
but rather Suresh's (two weeks ago, while thumbing the Sear's catalogue)?
You don't? Then why do you behave this way on mailing lists,
i.e. full quote including signature and everything below your text?
> The user incorrectly decided that everyone would just love to see the
> full text of the original message (perhaps in case they inexplicably
> missed it the first time!), and that it needed no marking to make it
> clear to readers that it isn't new material.
The archives, man, the archives... No reference headers means no threads
means no archives. *sigh* Can we make this end?
--
Robin S. Socha <http://socha.net/>
