>wrong. You pretend to provide security, but in reality you still allow
>your clients to behave stupid and catch a virus.
>If that happened on an important machine - with
>valuable data - they shouldn't be allowed to do so, instead they
>should be fired, possibly together with the user.
>A virus might happen on a sandbox. Nowhere else.
What a silly assertion. In a perfect world, this makes good sense, but the
reality is that the work force that we serve is more interested in
scientific/academic/business endeavors than in being perfectly trained on
how to use their desktop PC, and then summarily fired when they make a
mistake. If a level of protection can be provided to make their experience
safer, why shouldn't it be.
(comments about the incompetence of our IT staff summarily ignored... sorry
you feel the need to insult people you don't even know or deal with)
>A virus infection is a sign that someone - and possibly also the ones
>who should have teached that someone - made an error.
That is true enough, but if the virus can be stopped some of the time before
it even reaches the end user, why not?
