On 07/12/00 at 12:32 AM Ken Jones wrote:
>Martin Volesky wrote:
>>
>> Ken, I agree with you that the qmail delivery process is possibly more efficient.
>However, when talking to large mail hubs that
>> use any type of connection queing/throtling mechanisms, the qmail method may run
>into problems.
>
>Martin,
>
>I understand your problem. However, you do not have any proof.
>Please provide proof of your imagined "problem" so that real
>people can design fixes to your "problem".
>
>Without real proof and measured performance, your supositions
>are just fancifal abstractions. And have no real persumption
>to reality.
I agree with you on the presumption point Ken. And further agree that numbers are
always nice. What I
was trying to do is stimulate a discussion about an abstract point and had nothing to
do with factual
matters. My wording definately reflects this. Discussion leads to a creative process
called brainstorming
which in turn leads to though out development - a cruscial aspect of programming you
will agree...
Martin Volesky - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CTO - Deijlabs Corporation
1221 Mackay, Suite 200
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
H3G 2H5
Tel.: 514.399.9930 Fax.: 514.399.1117
