On Mon, Dec 11, 2000 at 11:11:51AM +1100, Rod... Whitworth wrote: > On Sun, 10 Dec 2000 18:03:57 -0500, Alex Pennace wrote: > > >This isn't qmail, it's ezmlm. ezmlm waits a week after the first > >bounce to send a warning note by default. > > Sad! I'd have to fix that if I ran it, but thanks for the info. > What happens with plain qmail in a similar circumstance? I suppose I'll find out if >I keep reading? Plain qmail bounces back shortly after it encounters a permanent failure.
- Does qmail really delay a bounce for this long? Rod... Whitworth
- Re: Does qmail really delay a bounce for this long? Alex Pennace
- Re: Does qmail really delay a bounce for this lo... Rod... Whitworth
- Re: Does qmail really delay a bounce for thi... Alex Pennace
- Re: Does qmail really delay a bounce for... Peter van Dijk
- Re: Does qmail really delay a bounce for this long? Matt Harrington
PGP signature