Quoting Einar Bordewich ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> "Robin S. Socha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > * Hubbard, David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > What does the MUA have to do with an MTA?
> >
> > Show me a competent Unix admin using Outlook or a similar
> > abomination and I won't show you the difference.
> <snip>
>
> So what you are saying, is that to be a good unix admin, you can't
> use Windows? I consider myself a pretty ok unix admin, but I can't
> live without my W2K laptop. It does it's job, and my linux machines
> are doing theirs. Something I prefer doing on my W2K laptop, and
> then agin other I prefer doing on one of my linux'es.
I said Outlook. This message is being written under Win98.
> Just another "MAC is bether than PC", "FreeBSD rulez linux" etc.....
> Can't beat them, join them!
Can beat them. Have beaten them. Will not be assimilated.
> BTW: I know my way around on Windows, MAC, Linux, FreeBSD, NextSTEP,
> etc.... and feel pretty good about it ;-)
Right. You're still using Outlook on a technical mailing list. Your
message still looks bad, has no reference headers (cf. "broken list
archive") and so on. Been there before, no need to discuss this here,
really. Please?
--
Robin S. Socha http://socha.net/
@400000003a2ee04c23b0f0a4 delivery 8351: deferral:
Connected_to_168.126.229.1_but_greeting_failed./Remote_host_said:_421_[nMail_1.045_(Windows_NT/2000)_SMTP_Server]_-_Server_too_busy,_retry_later/
